Poll majority: Gays' orientation can't change

Discussion in 'Politics' started by ZZZzzzzzzz, Jun 27, 2007.

  1. jem

    jem

    I am not putting down single parents - I am just pointing out zzz sophistry.
     
    #71     Jun 30, 2007
  2. I thought it was determined that AIDS was the byproduct of bestiality. Individuals practicing their freedom of have any type of "affairs" they find enjoyable.

    Adult men and (hopefully) adult chimps swapping bodily fluids...
    - oh crap!! :eek: :eek: , maybe even chimpanzee anal fluids at that!
    Geepers, this crap is discussing and simply ain't right. Agree?
    Now that there, is no right way to turn yo' wood to putty dude, but as you would have it it seems, all's fair in the pursuit of those Roman values!?

    I read your position Z as: Fu@k off with your controlling ideals- if a person finds "it" feels good, let it be -cause it's in their bedroom?

    Hail Caesar! :(

    Till they donate their putrid blood in exchange for a few coin or warthog burgers.
     
    #72     Jun 30, 2007
  3.  
    #73     Jun 30, 2007
  4. jem

    jem

    on the aclu thread zzzz spewed the following bile:

    1. Yall klanish crack me up...angry white males, angry fearful Christians who have a history of burning witches, inquisitions, killing American Indians, etc.

    ....all in the name of God, of course.


    and this :


    2. Only Right Wing Fundamentalist Christians walk around with pork on their feet...snorting, belching like the pigs they are...

    ---

    Nice substantive response zzz. so I will post the real issue again. Why don't you compare a loving two parent home with a loving one parent home.

    Or an average two parent home with and average one.


    Your comparisons were manipulative by design. As is most of your leftist crap. And again, I respect many single parents, I just point out that your view of a reengineered America is based on a croc of improperly considered experiments.
     
    #74     Jul 1, 2007
  5.  
    #75     Jul 1, 2007
  6. neophyte321

    neophyte321 Guest


    your brand of "intellectualism" is little more than a constant affront ... at the end of the day, you've accomplished little more than embarrass yourself and soil your audience...

    http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/affront


    Regards,

    One of the Klannish



    http://www.city-journal.org/html/17_2_artificial_insemination.html

    .....

    As intentionality has come to supplant biology, the law, by pretending nature doesn’t exist, has not caught up with reality; it has pole-vaulted over it. A family court in Burlington County, New Jersey, recently put two women on a state birth certificate. Last year, Virginia issued a birth certificate for a gay couple that read “Parent A” and “Parent B.” Massachusetts officials proposed crossing out “Father” on the state’s birth certificate and replacing it with “Second Parent” (until then-governor Mitt Romney nixed the plan). Many legal scholars are now proposing that courts move beyond the “heterosexist model” entirely. Why not put three parents—or four, for that matter—on the birth certificate? This past January, an Ontario court did just that. Intentionality, it seems, can accomplish almost anything.
     
    #76     Jul 1, 2007
  7. neophyte321

    neophyte321 Guest

    alright, as for accomplishments, you deserve credit for keeping the argument going, even if is done in your sick-twisted way ...
     
    #77     Jul 1, 2007
  8. Birth is not natural, so it is a "defect".

    Birth is the continuation of a false idea: that the Son of God can change himself.

    The concept of male and female is not natural.

    The behavior of male and female is not different than any other behavior. None of it is natural. But it is preferred.

    Preferences are a selection process that is not natural.

    Selection is a form of judgment, which is not natural to the minds way of thinking.

    The "last judgement" is a process of weaning the Son of God off of all preferential treatment of his brothers.

    Since preferential judgments keep the world turning, the world will end when there are no more judgements being made.

    The world will end because it is not natural.

    Meanwhile, not one form of behavior is more natural than another.

    Behavior is not natural.

    Since behavior was invented, some behavior is useful in making behavior obsolete.

    Male-female behavior is the most popular preference within an unatural way of thinking.

    It is used for perpetuating behavior.

    Behavior imprisons you because you need do nothing.

    Doing anything reinforces the idea that you are a body.

    So everything is a temptation.

    You are not a body, because the Son of God is not a body. He has no limits.

    Bodies are a limit. They limit love. Therefore they cannot "make" love.

    Love is union. Bodies separate, and can never join.

    Mind is joined, but bodies are devised to "prove" that the mind can be separate.

    To love is to allow what God joined - the mind - to be as it is: One.

    By letting what is true be true, the Son of God will "change" back to his natural state.

    What is true?

    All minds are joined as one.

    Let this be true, and you will know Heaven. And you will know love.

    Preferences will end, and with them, the world. So you see, anybody can change, but the Son of God is changless.





    Jesus
     
    #78     Jul 1, 2007
  9. neophyte321

    neophyte321 Guest

    Someone Respond Directly to the Following Paragraph: (ANYTHING WILL BE ACCEPTED!)



    http://www.city-journal.org/html/17...semination.html

    .....

    As intentionality has come to supplant biology, the law, by pretending nature doesn’t exist, has not caught up with reality; it has pole-vaulted over it. A family court in Burlington County, New Jersey, recently put two women on a state birth certificatex Last year, Virginia issued a birth certificate for a gay couple that read “Parent A” and “Parent B.” Massachusetts officials proposed crossing out “Father” on the state’s birth certificate and replacing it with “Second Parent” (until then-governor Mitt Romney nixed the plan). Many legal scholars are now proposing that courts move beyond the “heterosexist model” entirely. Why not put three parents—or four, for that matter—on the birth certificate? This past January, an Ontario court did just that. Intentionality, it seems, can accomplish almost anything.
     
    #79     Jul 1, 2007
  10. jem

    jem

    I think it can be a pretty fricken selfish thing to to do. The child may someday wish to know who the biological father is - perhaps for health reasons
     
    #80     Jul 1, 2007