Precisely why this is such a trove! Joe, will not ban for extreme controversy, so over time this emboldens a segment of the population to be more candid. It really is a nice setup.
for liberals hate speech is defined as: Inconvenient facts and opinions they don't entertain. It was for good reason only property owners had the right to vote. The demise of the west will be at the hands of politicians who've exploited those who've been given the right to vote without skin in the game.
Bad choice of wording, hiding I mean. I meant to say you are all protected, not a bad thing. I'm sorry for that. And, yes, another thing we found odd, and not on all the sites, but some, is the no show or ignore capacity. Odd, in that these are discussion boards. How can one discuss coherently when they ignore the other side. Perhaps Congress should consider this, or perhaps they already have.
Again, nothing to do with our little treatise, but I think that if we were all honest with each other, that both sides use inconvenient facts. The liberal slant is easily read, of course. The right is seems to be the same, only louder, and perhaps too conservative in that we really want to win. We, as in conservative, are fearful of Obama, not vice versa. I just wish we had a better ticket than Romney. There, I said it, sorry friends. As I said, I can't vote for Obama, and may have to stay home. Nothing to do with our little project.
Only one side calls that HATE SPEECH. Ironically it's their euphemism for talk radio, I guess they never listened to Air America very closely (specifically Randi Rhodes, and Mike Malloy ).
LOL. Indystink - just another liberal moron who made my ingnore list many moons ago. His analysis is akin to a liberal's broken view of the world. Keep it up Indystink. It seems some of your liberal compatriates hold you up as some Marxist God. But the real thinkers here know how limited your thinking is in reality.