POLL: If the election were held today, who would you pick?

Discussion in 'Politics' started by rcanfiel, Dec 1, 2007.

POLL: If the election were held today, who would you pick?

  1. McCain

    4 vote(s)
    7.1%
  2. Edwards

    2 vote(s)
    3.6%
  3. Romney

    8 vote(s)
    14.3%
  4. Obama

    4 vote(s)
    7.1%
  5. Thompson

    2 vote(s)
    3.6%
  6. Clinton

    5 vote(s)
    8.9%
  7. Giuliani

    4 vote(s)
    7.1%
  8. Someone else

    27 vote(s)
    48.2%
  1. BSAM

    BSAM

    "Dudn't" matter. 10 Mil to whichever one is really going to win the election is chickenfeed. That's like a hundred dollar bill to me and you.
     
    #21     Dec 2, 2007
  2. BSAM

    BSAM

    (Swinging a pocket watch on a chain in front of your eyes as you stare intently.....)

    TL, keep your eyes on the swinging watch. Keep watching, keep watching, keep watching. Now.....When I snap my fingers, you will come out of your deep sleep. Keep watching.....keep watching.....SNAP!!

    Whew! That was a close one. I thought we'd nearly lost you!:p
     
    #22     Dec 2, 2007
  3. 12/02/07

    Nationwide:

    Giuliani 22%
    Huckabee 17%
    Thompson 14%
    McCain 14%
    Romney 11%
    http://www.rasmussenreports.com/pub...1/daily_presidential_tracking_polling_history


    Iowa:

    Mike Huckabee, 29 percent
    Mitt Romney, 24 percent
    Rudy Giuliani, 13 percent
    Fred Thompson, 9 percent
    http://ap.google.com/article/ALeqM5jAGHaxw5TBx-E3aQxG_9bHEw3JyAD8T935QG0

    The fact that Huckabee has achieved these results without spending any money at all is nothing short of a miracle. Ron Paul meanwhile is holding steady at about 0% :D :D :D
     
    #23     Dec 2, 2007
  4. anyone that believes the mainstream media's cited polls is a bigger fool than ZZZZZZZZzzzz.... congratulations doodoo... enjoy your new bed buddy.

    any real increase in support for huckleberry has come because the media is pushing him like the blue plate special. a southern baptist preacher? come on... they have resorted to this solely to try to beat Ron Paul.


    <object width="425" height="355"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/4q5sjU-jgVA&rel=1"></param><param name="wmode" value="transparent"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/4q5sjU-jgVA&rel=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" wmode="transparent" width="425" height="355"></embed></object>
     
    #24     Dec 2, 2007
  5. BSAM

    BSAM

    (Speee, Rat----Did you ever hear of a dude named Jimmy Carter?)
     
    #25     Dec 2, 2007
  6. carter wasn't a preacher.
     
    #26     Dec 2, 2007
  7. Hmm Rat, in your first sentence you indicate that you don't believe polls showing that Huckabee is surging. In your next sentence you explain why Huckabee is surging. Don't you see a contradiction here? :D


    I smell a conspiracy.:D
     
    #27     Dec 2, 2007
  8. BSAM

    BSAM

    Carter was a staunch Southern Baptist. Those who wouldn't vote for the preacher would not vote for the Sunday school teacher either. It's not a complex logic.
     
    #28     Dec 2, 2007
  9. huckabee was doing terribly.... no support... then the media jumps in with their surge... so.. he went from nothing to a little.. and the media lies and says he is winning. dumbasses like you fall for it.
     
    #29     Dec 2, 2007
  10. carter didn't wear his faith on his forehead. just mark my words.. they will throw huckabee to the wolves when the time is right.
     
    #30     Dec 2, 2007