Jack makes me think of my 4 year old who wants attention all the time. They say getting old is getting childish again
I didn't think I'd get a straight answer from you. Let me try again: are you or any of your "PhDs" participating in the CNBC trading contest? And if so, under what nic(s)? Because showing results after the contest is over proves NOTHING, as multiple entry scams are older than you.
Geez Spydie, it looks like you're the one with her undies in a bunch! Might that be because you and some of your grape kool-aid drinking buddies have multiple entries in the CNBC contest? IF you are participating, the only way you'll have any credibility is to let us know the nics NOW...
I am glad that I am getting the appropriate level of decipherability. On target for you and still missing the market for virgin who is seeing AGM's.....lol The journal is up and recently (within an hour) we made the decision to post the results of my review of equities journal III as a wrap up of PVT to take it to expert level. I am well into the hiliter stage and the postings will be more of a textual nature for the slots of the learning model that you already have as a graphic. Along side that, I was planning on doing a dual run down to take into account a person who is still a full time employee and who is fast tracking capital accumulation to shift to full time trading (which may include transferring the template to commodities trading and equties sector rotation.) What we are doing is transparent on the equities and we hope everyone understands that. The CNBC stuff is all EOD oriented and I will slip the Q's that are coming up for that in after their use there. As you know a normal working person is not subject to the CNBC rules per se simply because the economizing CNBC did to run the contest wrecked the real aspects of trading were a person to be fully employed and not monitoring during the day. All CNBC trades in the contest happen at the same time, and, for convenience, CNBC chose to assign the entry value as that fictional time and value. So leading indicators of price that real traders (either employed or trading) using the methods will be posted for you side by side so the differences are clear. We will be moving up to expert in this pass, as stated in January. As usual, it will not be possible to do this to just provide the three emotional constructs of support, comfort and confidence. There will be the usual tattoo of fear, anxiety and anger, as expressed by the detractors that have every right in a public forum to be examples of what they misread in the posts I make to be helpful. This is my main job for 2007 in the PVT and SCT approaches that I advocate. When I appear over there soon, I hope that the standards set by Spyder and practitioners can continue and that the sort of thing going on in the six concurrent detractor threads can just be kept there by distributing all the stuff over those six continuing locations fueled by fear, anxiety and anger, All of which needs to be vented as shown by the recent scientific testing and solution generating of such people by Peterson, Lo , Repkin. Goleman and to some extent by coaches like CBOT's Shull and the Olympic coach turned financial coach, Kiev.
I do not know what prompted your delusional fantasy that I had participated in any CNBC Challenge. Most people who actually trade real money in the markets don't bother with online fantasy stock games. However, I do wish you luck as you continue to 'invest' your play money online. Once again, like so many other examples, you get it wrong. Not surprising for a woman of your intellect. Since you continue to experience reading comprehension issues, I'll type very slowly ..... I have No involvement with CNBC, their challenge, or as an audience member. In fact when Jack plans to attend the CNBC show, I plan to be spending a week in the Dominican Republic enjoying the sun, surf and sand. Real profits spend, Fantasyland dollars do not. Enjoy your fantasy role playing game. Clear enough for you? - Spydertrader
You will just have to settle for an every Friday prime time 1 hour weekly television show about the contest. I believe you are also able to monitor the CNBC blogs that they have running. If they are asking me how well the blogs are working, I assume that they will be asking you too if they feel like it. It is not my job to be a support service for your whims about a contest. There is nothing I can do about how the contest works and when people are told what. I am, obviously, not allowed to inform you in advance of a show what is going on in that show. Get real. You quoted some conversation I had that was responsive to an inquery by another person to me. Get real. I am a ringer with regard to CNBC and its productions.
Speaking of reading comprehension issues and intellect... I didn't say you were participating... I asked. That's what the question mark means. Also, you have absolutely zero knowledge of what I trade and when I trade it so you're the one with the delusional fantasies. Finally, if you really were doing well trading you wouldn't be going to the Dominican Republic... that's the poor man's island getaway. Have fun anyway...
So are you participating or not? If so, under what name(s)? Don't pretend you can't answer. And no, they won't be asking for me because I am NOT participating. You're a ringer for CNBC? How so? The definition I found for "ringer" at dictionary.com that made the most sense to me is: "any person or thing that is fraudulent; fake or impostor." Is that what yoiu meant? http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/ringer