Poll: Collateral Damage

Discussion in 'Politics' started by jakejones, Oct 9, 2011.

Collateralization of innocents

  1. Collaterization of innocent Pakistans is justifiable

    0 vote(s)
  2. Collateralization of innocent Pakistanis is wrong

    1 vote(s)
  1. A war with Pakistan is long overdue.

    But the Paks, unlike the Taliban, have nukes.

    This probably means we will need to resort to a 'first-use' policy.

    But if we nuke 'em, there will probably be a few within Pakistan who are collateral damage e.g. the Christian minorities who support us.

    The object of this poll is to answer the question, does the means justify the ends?
  2. This poll is important. Is nuking Pakistan worth the collateral damage?
  3. So far the majority are in favor of not collaterallizing Pakistan.