Plunge Protection Team

Discussion in 'Trading' started by OPTIONAL777, Jun 28, 2002.

  1. ddefina

    ddefina

    If you figure what the crash of 29' did for the economy, you'd have to assume aversion processes are in place for this. We prop the banking system, the dollar, airlines, etc. this is only common sense. Too bad that short term fixes have reality as a shadow.
     
    #11     Jun 28, 2002
  2. Babak

    Babak

    The damage was not from the crash itself but from the extremely tight monetary policy adopted right after.
     
    #12     Jun 28, 2002
  3. trdrmac

    trdrmac

    I would give up two possible scenarios.

    The first is short covering. The short level is very high, and since each sell off has rallied it is hard to press shorts, so they cover.

    The second is that there are several indicators that indicate a short term oversold condition. So maybe we are starting to form a base. But I suspect that sept support will prove to be pretty significant resistance on any rally. Especially on the spazdaq.

    belly's rumbling hope everyone has a good weekend.
     
    #13     Jun 28, 2002
  4. The New York Federal Reserve has stepped in on a number of occassions and started buying index futures to try to stabilize things.

    Wouldn't be a surprise if there was a little of that going on after the Worldcom blowup too.
     
    #14     Jun 28, 2002
  5. you're right Babak. Crashes are nothing...It's the darn refusal to create more money that messes things up...:p
     
    #15     Jun 28, 2002
  6. Babak

    Babak

    hey what can I say? I'm from the old school. Austrian school of economics, that is.
     
    #16     Jun 28, 2002
  7. It doesn't have to be men in black

    The futures crash on the WCOM news in the premarket, then the market says, hey, that stock was already under a buck when this news hits, so maybe we're over-reacting, and the market moves up.

    Then the Xerox news hits for Friday. The market says, hey, if we could digest WCOM, then maybe we have no reason to panic over a dispute between the regulators and KPMG over how to book Xerox's sales. By the way KPMG still stands by their original numbers and I would take their expertise over the other dopes.

    Maybe I'm wrong and men never did walk on the moon etc, the government is acting weird again yada yada

    or maybe just a lot of dudes saw it the way I saw it.
     
    #17     Jun 28, 2002
  8. This accounting thing has so many layers that we're just starting to see. Before it is all done I'd be surprised if they (the big 4 now lol) all don't have more than a little dirt on their hands. I don't think Anderson was unique in its "creativity". The whole accounting industry may have to reform before it ends. After that let's go after the legal industry. Won't that be fun?
     
    #18     Jun 29, 2002
  9. jem

    jem

    As a former lawyer I would like to say it is the lawyers that will save this country. (Especially if they can make a buck doing it.) As long as the legal system is well designed it can and should create incentives for people to do private good. That is where the lawyers come in. By the time they are done ripping the wall street crooks and big 87654321 accounting firms a new one they, the crooks, will be begging (paying) congress to regulate them.

    (By the way I am hopeful that the lawyers will clean out my church too. )

    So you see when Shakespeare said the first thing you need to do is kill all the lawyers --- you have to understand the context. He was saying lawyers prevent abuse.

    Now I know lawyers can be greedy crooked jerks too, but they can still serve society.
     
    #19     Jun 29, 2002
  10. There is an unnatural overpopulation of lawyers. Shakespeare was on to something.
     
    #20     Jun 29, 2002