Is anyone here smart enough to realize that this whole thing was blown up by the Obama MEDIA camp to gain sympathy? What else will the Democrats do to try and win this election? Weren't these 2 kids under the drinking age? Does anyone REALLY think they would of pulled off the crap they were dreaming of doing? OF COURSE NOT! DUH!
Yes because blue places like say....Chicago are such safe and pleasant places to be. (more American's have been murdered in Chicago this year then in Iraq)
There are more people living in chicago than there are americans in iraq. Large american cities are war zones. You make a wrong turn and you'll end up dead. doesn't matter who you are.
Its not just the democrats, its the entire country, i.e. an overwhelming majority that feels like Bush has royally screwed up. Bush went to war to secure our oil and of course oil companies as well as America will profit as a result. He rationalized this by the WMD argument. Everything you state is a fact of history and a lot of people are JUDGING BUSH BY HIS ACTIONS not by his skin color or beliefs. Now suddenly because these two idiots supposedly had some grandiose and totally unworkable plot, we are supposed to shut up about Obama's decades long association with unrepetant terrorists, people who actually carried out multiple bombings and planned more? We're supposed to follow the lead of the media and just softpedal any criticisms of Obama because some nut might decide to come unglued?[/QUOTE] Its the guilt by association argument that you are again using as a two way street. Criticizing Obama is one thing, but, calling him as a terrorist, i.e. associating him with our enemy that we are at war with is going to far. You need to at least admit that there are going to be a lot MORE motivated radicals out there trying to assassinate him given how he is being portrayed as "anti-American" and "associates with terrorists". These are all statements made by the McCain campaign that have repercussions BEYOND simple character assault, these statements motivate the idiots of the world to TRY AND DO SOMETHING ABOUT IT. If the media had done its job and thoroughly vetted Obama, say to the extent they did Joe the plumber or Todd Palin, none of this would be an issue. They didn't. Instead they acted more like arms of the Obama campaign, accepting anything Obama said at face value and hissing at anyone who questioned it. So we get the bizarre situation that because a candidate has a long record of associations with some of the most reprehensible people in the country, we are not allowed to say anything because it might upset someone? How crazy is that?[/QUOTE] Your statement is ignoring the fact the WE ALL KNOW about his associations already. We have know about them for 2 years, HE'S ALREADY BEEN VETTED YOU PARTISAN TWIT.... the McCain campaign has resorted to these tactics in the last few weeks because they are the only "questionable" aspects about Obama.
Who the fuck are you? Get a clue you mentally challenged pigfucking hillbilly. No need to get personal. Since guilt by association seems to be the theme of the anti-Obama contingent, let's do a 'guilt by association' subset of the republican party. What PARTY do you think the following groups vote for: a. bigoted (anti-gay) b. racist (white supremacists), c. xenophobes (stay the f--k out of my country) You have a 50-50 shot in each case.