PLEASE VOTE AGAINST THE BILL H.R. 1068-link enclosed

Discussion in 'Prop Firms' started by proptrader12345, Feb 18, 2009.

  1. YIKES!! I read this...just must not have "sunk in"...sheesh..if I missed that imagine what all the senators missed in the stimulus bill...oh wait...everything...they didn't read it at all. Anyway...thanks for setting me straight guys...its been a long day I guess!
     
    #31     Feb 18, 2009
  2. I just signed and gave my 2 cents.

    How about no bailouts, then we don't pay for big, stupid, fat cats' mistakes.

    The socialist wolves are circling the henhouse...frickin' scum! lol

    :mad:
     
    #32     Feb 18, 2009
  3. by your logic, if someone robs a bank, we should send the old lady customer in the lobby to prison

    after all, SOMEBODY has to be held accountable, dont they?
     
    #33     Feb 18, 2009
  4. you're fucking insane

    what does a CME futures trader have to do with ANY of this?!?!?

    no CME people created the problem

    CME people didnt get or ask for any of the TARP money

    CME ISNT EVEN ON WALL STREET!!!!!!!!!
     
    #34     Feb 18, 2009
  5. take this stuff seriously

    in 1998, all of a sudden the democratic and republican parties, the media and industry all of a sudden decided to drop the hammer on citizen tech workers

    it was a kafka like transformation

    bill after bill passed, supported with flat out lies, in congress and the media

    many of you people have no idea what it's like to wake up one day and realize society's competely turned against you

    the process was very simple

    1) democrats pandered for votes among minorities and social leftists who wanted expanded government

    2) silicon vally types had leftist social agenda, but fascist labor desires for their own sweatshops - they became the democrat party's ATM

    3) democrats passed bill after bill beating the shit out of citizen tech workers - year in year out, always something vicious in the works - citizen tech worker's interests were the 'fuel' to be spent for the 'greater good'

    God help anyone who's viewed as political food
     
    #35     Feb 18, 2009
  6. This is some bad news shiite. Some are saying it has no chance to pass. I hope so, but there has been plenty of terrible legislation that has gotten thru.

    Baron ought to get into this too. Maybe start a "Fight the Proposed Trader Tax" section. If this POS goes though, ET will be a ghost town in a year. :mad:
     
    #36     Feb 18, 2009
  7. dunadain

    dunadain

    The important difference is that the one bill is to ADD yet another new tax on us (and lawmakers love those), while the other bill is to REPEAL the income tax (lawmakers hate repealing any tax) to replace it with state run sales taxes.

    That's why, in this case, we need to e-mail / contact your reps in our current Democratic party controlled congress to not add yet another tax, because that is what they normally do when left unchecked.
     
    #37     Feb 18, 2009
  8. i still say the key thing to monitor is CME's position

    they have clean hands on this whole mess, and they will be SHUT DOWN if this goes through

    cme is in chicago, obama's from chicago
     
    #38     Feb 18, 2009
  9. Tide31

    Tide31

    The last time STET was seriously considered in 1990 the lobbyists that came out strongly against it weren't who you'd think they might be. The liberal left has come up with this idea but when they see who comes out against it, they will probably back down. I added this to my petition stamp:

    Some of the strongest lobbying against a securities tax has come from organized labor. Union officials will again argue that a large share of securities transactions are conducted by pension funds and that a tax on them would reduce workers' retirement benefits.

    Wall St. should pay for its own bailout? They are EXEMPT from excise taxes of this sort. The people most hurt by the under-regulated over-levered banks, the American taxpayer/consumer/saver/investor will be specifically targeted by a financial transaction tax to foot this bailout. Now that makes sense, huh??
    :confused:
     
    #39     Feb 18, 2009
  10. CME STATES OPPOSITION TO FUTURES TRANSACTION TAX
    Article from:pR Newswire Article date:February 6, 1995 More results for: CME STATES OPPOSITION TO FUTURES TRANSACTION TAX | Copyright informationCOPYRIGHT 1995 PR Newswire Association, Inc. This material is published under license from the publisher through the Gale Group, Farmington Hills, Michigan. All inquiries regarding rights should be directed to the Gale Group. (Hide copyright information)

    CHICAGO, Feb. 6 /PRNewswire/ -- The Chicago Mercantile Exchange today reiterated its long-standing opposition to a transaction tax on futures and options included in the administration's Fiscal Year 1996 budget proposal to Congress.

    Said Jack Sandner, chairman of the CME: "The Chicago Mercantile Exchange and the futures industry in the United States compete against exchanges and other markets around the world that are unencumbered by transaction taxes. Our industry has created hundreds of thousands of jobs that would be put needlessly at risk by a transaction tax of any size, and Congress has come to the same conclusion again and again when such a tax has been proposed and ...

    Read all of this article with a FREE trial


    Related newspaper, magazine, and journal articles:


    http://www.highbeam.com/doc/1G1-16416423.html

    well, at least the cme has dealt with this before
     
    #40     Feb 18, 2009