Quite good hapaboy. If you're smart enough to understand me then why do you become feeble over dead children? You seem to think of them as more than human. "Nearly Human": a good definition of me by one that disagrees with my ideals. I would refer to you as nearly logical. You're smart enough to understand basic character traits, but tell me something I don't know. As fas I can tell I'm challenging you whilst your depth relies on my spurring insights. Also, I may be partially delusional but only partially. Which means I'm still better than. I've received affirmation of my greatness from other greats, and from followings. Better to be a little delusional. In one post you write that I'm "nearly human" then in another post you try to diminish me with a gimmicky statement declaring my introduction to the mainstream. Do you realize that you're doing this, (contradicting one's-self is very bad)? You seem afraid to disclose any personal information, and any questionable opinions, without me first reassuring you that it's okay to express yourself. Traits of a follower or is this some sort of strategy? And then you have the stupidity of blind audacity to refer to me as "nearly human." Why don't you write something that displays a superior intellect and judgement instead of relying on my breadth? Becuase I've nearly reached the bottom of the source, and you've nothing left to say, and I defeated your ideas with my first post to this thread. You do seem afraid to divulge any personal info, and any opinion without my prompting. How else can I prove that I'm vastly superior to you? Tell me and I shall. I think you've nothing at all to say. At least my egomania makes me far more interesting than your defeatist, pathetic, sentimentalizing, hypocritical, persona. You know, you can always change? Get a new personality. Only a control- freak, coward, artless person would stick with an anitquated character just to save face. In which case you're giving everyone else's opions more importance than your own. Then again I don't know you. I know that you're scared, short-sighted, and not artistic. Poetic hatred: better to be passionate than bland. You obviously take no responsibility for your stupidity and artlessness. A mature hapaboy, with an adult version of a teenage thought pattern.
Not possible. Your particular brand of ignorance only makes sense to those with the same affliction. Fortunately, I am not one of them. Feeble? Interesting choice of words, for it indicates that you equate compassion with weakness. I wonder if this stems from personal trauma or plain indifference. In any event, it is nothing new or original. Quite commonplace, in fact. And it is obvious that our definition of "human" differs greatly. Perhaps someday when you are a father, because you undoubtedly are not one now, you will understand why I disagree with your abhorrent assessment of these dead children as being worthless. Let me rephrase that: IF you are ever a father. I find it highly unlikely that you will be able to find a female, at least of our species, who will procreate with you on a voluntary basis (or at least while conscious). The only ideals you have shown thus far are hatred and a contempt for the basic finer qualities of our species. You claim to both love and hate the human race; I would be interested in hearing what you love about it. You are challenging only because you are challenged. LOL! Then we agree that one of the flaws of our species is a tendency to be drawn like lemmings to mediocrity, if that. Plus you sound like every stereotypical serial killer or megalomaniac ever concocted by Hollywood. 'Sup, Wild Bill! You misunderstood. The "mainstream" I was referring to was the monotonous drone of hatred that exudes in our society's culture, poetry included. I have yet to see them, but I hardly need your reassurances. Perhaps you need to believe that I do, but I'm sorry, you'd be wrong. If you believe that calling these dead children "young religious idiots," "pathetic," "parasites," - and stating that the world is probably better off without them - "defeated" my idea that they are innocent and their deaths should not be celebrated, well, my only advice to you is to not have any children. Please. Even with a woman you abduct and hide in a well in the basement of your home. Because you'll be a horrible father, and they'll grow up dealing with the same insecurities and demons that you now suffer from. Since your idea of superiority is undoubtedly shallow, what information would you need in order to pursue this agenda? My net worth? My address? The value of my home? How many swimming pools I have in the backyard? What kind of a car(s) I drive? My educational credentials? Why on earth would I ever post personal information like that on an internet chat board? Why would you? And why would you ever take my word for it anyway? HINT: Cyberspace is a very dangerous place. The last thing I need is a deranged stalker, especially one with your sociopathic tendencies. And you wouldn't want me on your trail either. I'm your huckleberry. Such a need for validation. I am leaning now more toward your past consisting of a troubled childhood bereft of personal attention or, perhaps, inappropriate attention. Why else this passionate need to be considered "superior"? Was it competition in your family? Sibling rivalry? Say, you're not Tito Jackson, are you?!? You are obsessed with art. And of emphasizing your perceived greatness at it. And of denegrating any you feel do not appreciate your genius and mastery of it. Images from "Red Dragon" are coming to mind here. (shudder) tick, tock, your hour is up. Au revoir.
for all those fxxking son of bitches who can look at those pictures and come up with all those fxxking excuses and justification for these WAR CRIMES.. just imagine they were your childern, your cute son and daugther. just imagine coming back from work, and see your wife and childern 's limbs scatter around house, apparently, they have been bombed to piece by a iraqi helicoter which has mistaken your house for your local church, a christian church..of couse.. how would u feel? I don't think the word "hate" would begin to descibe it...
wow.... man thats got to be tough. You're right "hate" wouldnt begin to describe the feeling inside...more like insane desperation..
I must say that your rebuttal is quite good. Though the quality will only upgrade you to Mainstream Academic. You've made many inaccurate assumptions which I shall now partially reveal. Firstly I'm not a socipath, rather I'm hyper logical. I own a non profit corporation. The incorporation and licenses were and are paid for out of my own pocket. So that pretty much discredits your entire psychopath arguement. As far as dead children are concerned, no I don't care. My ultimate decision about their death being good or bad is based on whether or not the mode of death was good or bad. In order for the mode of death to have been good it would have had to be environmentally friendly. I think calling me ignorant is totally unfounded. Nothing I've written indicates any sort of ignorance. Rather, you have displayed ignorance by: contradicting yourself; relying on my insight to use as material for your rebuttals; by assuming and asserting incorrectly; by being incapable of seeing things beyons a humanitarian perspective; because your sentimentalizing about children displays a flaw in your logic regarding the whole picture instead of just fragments which you allow yourself to perceive. You assume that I don't have the work to support my statements of my greatness, but I do. Your troubled childhood theoryy is incorrect. Yes I hate mediocrity. What I can't stand is your lack of insight. Your illogic. Innocent children are products of innocent parents? What sort of parent would allow their children to be in harms way? These children, generally, will grow up to be the same sort of people their parents and ancestors are and were. In my opinion, those god loving ancestors are worthless. You seem to hold the ideal that everyone deserves a place on earth. I say may they do but only if they and we live responsibly. Responsibility depends on whether or not they contribute more than they consume. Thus far I see god idiots as consuming with a false sense of righteousness: a barbaric and primitive righteousness. Yes as I've previously stated I'm insecure and have a need for validation because I'm not mainstream, and because I hate illogic. The mainstream which you apparently proudly represent is repulsive and overpowering. Imagine how many people in this world I think are just like you. Those Iraqis are little more than the Arab version of you. Illogical, short-sighted and worthless. Tell me what justifies your existence? It's not a racial or cultural judgement for me to write that the world is better off without extra mouths to feed. I may so much as give you credit if you're worthwhile in areas not dependant upon reasoning. Bottom line, your points are very mainstream and they lack depth and severe logic. Your logic is soft. Your logic is flawed because you fail to understand the big picture. I'm led to believe that you're a god believer because I've experienced such sentimentalizing from other god idiots. The word innocent used in this context leads me to believe you're biblically idealistic and that you're naive. No one is innocent. Are you aware that children have less of a sense of compassion than adults? I think that you too suffer from insecurities and that you alone suffer from a feeling of worthlessness. Also, I'm not capable of killing another human being due to the below stated reasoning. 1. I could be wrong. 2. There is no logic just the pretend game of logic. 3. I wouldn't want to experience that. Note: I've never killed anything larger than a rainbow trout. So when are you going to stop wasting my time and create some real insight not just TV derived insight. Your allusions to TV affirm what I wrote about you being oblivious to your own affectation. I'm more worried about you than you are of me. A logical person, which I'm, would never stalk someone. It's usually people with flawed logic that stalk and hurt people. You allowing yourself to be and act flawed states that you have cowardly and dishonorable capabilities. You're not to be trusted. And therefore you're more likely than I to participate in killing children.
Very good, take your superior intelligence errr garbage elsewhere, but no.....you come back with more bs The least you can do is to stick to your own word, show a spec of personal integrity, get lost and spew your garbage elsewhere. I know I'm asking you too much..you know be true to your own self per your own statements GET LOST ASSHOLE, stick to your OWN word. You come in the thread post crap off topic, trying to justify us killing their children. And now saying I dodged your question? Out of courtesy I replied and I asked you to back up your garbage opinions with historical facts, and I would stand down. You kept on ranting your mental masturbations and jumping all over the place. shhhheeeeeshhh Now you are taking this to religion and born again? Whatever has been frying your brain looks irreparable. Bleeding heart? Hell man, YOU try to justify killing children, because your heart bleeds about previous killings!!!!! :eek: Get a fucking grip on what shit your are spewing. Get lost man, be true to your word, show some self respect (yeah right), go back to scumyas toilet and eat up some more crap. Shhheeeshhh you believe killing children is a justifiable action in your mind...... unreal You are a truly evil person. yeah peace to you too...
hapaboy, and the others, batrakus, onewaypockets, thanks for your comments. I'm not trying to support or oppose your thoughts, only curious about them and how some readers view/think the video/voice clip. Maybe it warrants a thread for it self. What we have is a video and some voice from the US aircraft pilot/gunmen etc. I am looking at the facts: It is a US aircraft carrying autoranging guns capable of attacking. The four men are in the middle of a farm land. It doesn't say where. Notice the tractor tiller, the processed soil strip behind it, the truck and the small pick up, no other visible structures around. The men seem unarmed, and not wearing any special uniforms. One tried to hide under the truck was at first shot and severely wounded judging from his range of motion after he got hit. The aircraft men see him going down, confirm he is wounded, and the order comes in to finish him up.?? So the questions I have: If there was not a US attack fighter there but we were flying by looking down what do we see? 4 enemy troops? threatening US? or 4 farmers in the middle of a farm working on it? Not sure. Presumably the intelligence was right about them being enemies ( I have to assume yes and the gunman was following orders) Was the intelligence right? After all White House now "blames US intelligence for misrepresenting the facts to them" about Iraq, 9/11 etc....... Lastly, the order come in to finish up the severely wounded person. Where they a threat? Finish up a wounded person? Kill them before they kill us? Again. not supporting or opposing... only looking at the video and voices. something you will not see on evening news..
First of all: Bleeding heart? Hell man, YOU try to justify killing children, because your heart bleeds about previous killings!!!!! :eek: Get a fucking grip on what shit your are spewing. The above is NOT my quote. You seem incapable of even quoting someone correctly. Just more proof im dealing with a moron here. Lets set the record straight... YOU DID DODGE MY QUESTION. You CONTINUE to dodge it. This is not a debate...this is a NOLAN sermon. Your a complete idiot because you are not willing to allow for the deaths of some to save the deaths of many more. Pure evil. Notice that you refuse to address this issue, because its obvious you cant. Ill give you one more shot to prove your not a complete moron. What would you do if Nazi german tanks rolled into your city with an innocent baby strapped to each tank????? Would you just surrender because you cant kill babies?!?!???? WATCH NOLAN DODGE THE QUESTION AGAIN peace axeman