Easy for him to say!!!! ROTFLMAO! Why doesn't this guy let me do the speaking for him with my immense talent on loan from God? I mean I do the thinking for his supporters. Why not let me use my talents to their fullest extent? Seriously; I can see why Maverick thought this was his greatest press conference. Sure other Presidents have been funny at the podium. But not like my guy. His humor is so much more sophisticated, the dumb liberal press idiots didn't even laugh. Until later. You see, my friends, only the very sharpest of minds picked up on the subtlety of it all. What is wrong with the press? I will tell you. They are all blinded by their liberalism and their stupidity. Brush (gotta half an oxy for me?) Limbaugh
Instead of dissecting your ramblings line by line as I usually do, I instead ran your latest post through my Sony Bombast Decoder and have concluded the following: 1) You're upset. 2) You're upset because you cannot effectively articulate your reasoning - in fact you refuse to - without further exposing your flaws. As such, you are reduced solely to ad hominem attacks and pathetic attempts at elitism to escape the need to clarify your reasoning. But that's just my opinion, and as we both know, opinions by nature cannot be proved or disproved. In any event, rational debating between us is not possible, at least not on this subject. I do not think it ever was. So we are left with this flame war which could go on forever if we wanted it to. We could exchange insults ad nauseum and neither of us will change his opinion of the other. You will forever consider me, among other things, an artless, unoriginal coward and "military idiot." I will always think you to be an ignorant, immature, callous spoiled brat cursed with horrendous English skills and an ego that far exceeds actual talent, if any. It is all very tedious and a waste of both our time. I hope that at least you'll agree with me on that score.
I don't find it to be a waste of my time, I rather enjoy it and look forward to your posts. Conduct whatever psycho-analysis you wish. I have effectively articulated my reasoning, but you wish to ignore facts when reality don't support your intentions. I wholly believe myself to be a better writer than you, and so I'm upset that: you refuse to acknowledge your inability of creativity; you refuse to acknowledge my defined and unassailable artistic superiority. How can you, with a logical mind, actually write that I'm a bad writer and you a better writer than me? You backed down from my challenges using infantile remarks. You refuse to attempt to compete with me on a creative level. You childishly and unabashedly use my ideas as substance for your invectives against me. This is another good example of why your insecurities make my insecurities seem trivial: you've no self-esteem. furthermore, this is also a good example of your inability to comprehend logic. Do you truly wonder why I ended the debate on dead children? You're incapable of conclusions that are unfavorable for you. You're incapable of deducing properly. Thus, you're incompetent. These aren't flames, or ad hominen remarks, but are statements which have supportable facts which I've accomplished through arguing with you. I feel the need to reiterate which is why you'll find that the above statements are recurring. I restate these ideas for the purpose of your understanding. I hope that they may help you with your introspection. I mean nothing but the best for you. If you had the courage to support your invectives with actual substance then I would possibly think differently of you. Because you refuse to meet my writing, and other, challenges, I find that you're in fact trite, and a coward who is incapable of any real substance. You have given no information that disputes the previous statement. I have a multitude of reasons that support the above statements.
You view the debate as a waste of time because you lose on nearly every count. But in actuality, I've offered you a lot of insight to your character. I think I've enligthened you of yourself. You should thank me.
When the debate is lost, slander becomes the tool of the loser. - Socrates As expected, you continue with the flame war. You discount your total inability to address the subject of this entire proceeding, then make adolescent challenges in order to validate your sense of self. It is an entirely unoriginal formula that you will no doubt employ in future arguments in which you find yourself in an untenable position. Surely you have better things to do with your time. I suggest you devote yourself to your studies, beginning with dusting off those grammar and spelling texts. Even pathetic attempts to pick up faceless, anonymous women like mytwo cents on the internet have a far better chance of success (however slight) than jousting with a "military idiot." And by the way, those are not opinions or slander, but facts verified by your postings on ET. You will undoubtedly respond with further base invectives and bluster. I may or may not decide to rejoin the fray if I am in the mood and have the time after making love to my beautiful wife, enjoy lunch on our lanai, and spend the rest of this beautiful day at a North Shore villa overlooking the Pacific in the delightful company of many friends. I leave you to your dorm room masturbations and lamentations of the soul which torment the great artists like yourself. (Opinion)
When the debate is lost, slander becomes the tool of the loser. - Socrates =Nice proverb, too bad it doesn't fit this situation because I love a good generalization. Your need to quote others encourages and substantiates my opinions even more so. Though I do envy your vacation or Hawaiian lifestyle. As expected, you continue with the flame war. You discount your total inability to address the subject of this entire proceeding, then make adolescent challenges in order to validate your sense of self. =No flames but accusations backed by facts. It is an entirely unoriginal formula that you will no doubt employ in future arguments in which you find yourself in an untenable position. You're deluded, you are. Surely you have better things to do with your time. I suggest you devote yourself to your studies, beginning with dusting off those grammar and spelling texts. =Gee, your writing abilities certainly do make mine seem crude. If I'm so talentless then why do you refuse to meet my writing challenge? Even pathetic attempts to pick up faceless, anonymous women like mytwo cents on the internet have a far better chance of success (however slight) than jousting with a "military idiot." And by the way, those are not opinions or slander, but facts verified by your postings on ET. =Yes, I love faceless women with nice bodies, so what? At least I have a face and an authentic opinion. At minimum I realize my affectations, and I don't let my competition affect my rebuttals. You don't even have an opinion, you just think that you do. Those aren't your ideas they belong to others'. You will undoubtedly respond with further base invectives and bluster. I may or may not decide to rejoin the fray if I am in the mood and have the time after making love to my beautiful wife, enjoy lunch on our lanai, and spend the rest of this beautiful day at a North Shore villa overlooking the Pacific in the delightful company of many friends. =Undoubtedly, I respond but not with pathetically self-depricating statements such as you prattle. Invectives yes. You need to make love to your beautiful, but undoubtedly mindless, wife. This isn't an unfounded judgement, in order for you to make love to someone that person would have to be as trite as you. (The idea that love requires equitableness.) I leave you to your dorm room masturbations and lamentations of the soul, which we all know torment the great artists like yourself. (Opinion) =How nice of you. How old are you? Please don't leave in a state of fear and disappoint. I want us to continue the evocation of your artless "soul."
You're trying to give him a way to bow out and at the same time save face. How pathetic of you and him. His excuses. Stay out this SAMIAM.
You think hap needs to "save face"??? You're a funny young man. You don't charge for this kind of entertainment, do you rowen?
I think hapa and you are the only people that think that hapa actually has any face remaining. You, because I've insulted you in the past (I don't know with what statement or when). Hapa, because he must in oder to alleviate my proving his cowardice, artlessness, illogic, and general incompetance