I bet you couldn't wait to white glaze your knuckles after feeling undaunted. Must be a wonderful feeling to find manhood in debating anonymous posters on ET and measuring your dauntiness.
Ok, please help me get this straight: Let's say you & LoZZZer were to have an argument over which actor played Superman in the 70's & 80's films of the same name: You claim that the part was played by Christopher Reeve, while LoZZZer steadfastly and repeatedly insists that Superman was in fact played by Sean Connery, all while repeatedly calling you a complete idiot and laughing hysterically at your 'ignorance'... <b>Would that be your idea of a 'good debate'?</b>
i voted no also. if you don't like someone put them on ignore. i do however support banning doodoo since wael got the boot. doodoo is far worse and i would rather not see anyone go.. but its only fair since they got rid of his debate partner.
Yeah, I agree. Banning just one of em, is like being offended by two gays, and punishing the catcher but not the pitcher. As if âThatâ makes a difference.
My what a difference a year makes! First Thunderpussy goes apeshit calling for the resident troll's banishment, then lambasts those who are merely trying to point out the troll's perversities, which Thunderpussy states were the very basis for him starting this thread to begin with. Is Thunderpussy schizophrenic?
I did not "lambast" (sic) you. I merely thought it was fascinating that YOU, a TROLL, would complain about someone else's conduct. Your trolling this thread is the cherry on top.
Yeah, leave it to a moonbat Canadian to make the moral equivalency argument that protesting pedophilia is as bad as defending it or even engaging in it. You're a nutjob. Hopefully you live alone and therefore are minimally harmful to others.
There's that comprehension deficit again. Frankly, I admire the courage it must take for you to try and make it in the world today with little more than a brain stem.
There's that whole dodge thing again. Frankly, your ability to evade when your ridiculous "arguments" are laid bare almost rivals that of the very person who is the subject of this thread. It's a shame you two don't get along since you have SO much in common: intellectual dishonesty, rank hypocrisy, a fear of rational discourse, ad hominem as your first line of defense, etc., etc. If you are truly honest with yourself, I believe you will discover that you called for his banishment because he reminded you too much of yourself, which speaks to the level of your self-loathing. Get a clue, boyo....
Tdog, my beef in this issue is not with you. Sorry for my part in letting this back and forth between you and I get this far.