Discussion in 'Stocks' started by lpchad, Jun 3, 2010.
dig deeper, scalper.
the exit price is at $10.
"Additionally, while Treasury hasn't announced when it will start selling the stock, the process will take at least the rest of the year. During that time, the current price ($4.18 per share as of March 29) could fall below the "break-even" price of $3.25 a share. In the last three months alone, the price has fallen as low as $3.15, well below the break-even price. So while the stock price may be above $4 per share today, even a relatively small price slump could jeopardize the sale's profit margin. Unless Treasury chooses to stop the stock sale in such a situation, it could even result in taxpayers losing money on the sale."
thanks, piker, but still not what i'm referring to, perhaps the game plan has changed since the beginning of the deal. maybe the USG needs the cash more than C.
and seriously, what a garbage source. ombwatch? find something on the wsj and maybe your argument will have credibility.
Smart man. People with high hopes for C, GS, and any other previous market leader remind me of people who keep buying DRYS b/c they believe it's really a $100 dollar stock. C is weak. Looking for 40 in that stock is sheer hope. There are a ton of strong stocks out there with strong earnings growth and great sales that will be ripe for buying whenever the market regains some strength. Citi is not one of them.
Didn't Goldman get downgraded yesterday by the same guy (Dick Bove) that was screaming it was a buy on CNBC an hour after the SEC charges were publicized about 2 months ago? The hilarity.
It seems like a lot of guys believe in buy low and sell lower in this thread.
i'll get back to you on that when C hits 4$ again. in the meanwhile,
just my $0.02, 10,000 shares at a time.
DRYS was a great trade, like, a year ago. it's 2010 now, or short it. no one is storing oil in drifting offshore oil tankers. stupid idea from the start.
did it ever occur to you that someone has to be buying the USG's share of C? hmm? and i'm sure those investors are a helluvalot better educated than you pikers are. i know i am. i don't have the initials CFA after my name because i'm stupid. i'll follow the hedgies any day before i take the advice of college dropout daytraders. i'm buying C, holding, and retiring on the appreciation, and someday, when the dividends kick back in, i'll laugh all the way to citibank.
"did it ever occur to you that someone has to be buying the USG's share of C? hmm? and i'm sure those investors are a helluvalot better educated than you pikers are. i know i am."
This argument applies to every stock in the market. Every stock is owned by at least one sophisticated institution, sophisticated institutions never buy bad stocks, therefore every stock is a buy.
The fact is, even the smartest investors buy more duds than home runs. So the fact that one smart investor is buying C is not proof of anything. In fact, because most institutions have to buy hundreds of stocks, the institutions will likely know less about a stock than a piker with time on his hands.
i`d rather be playing golf with these guys than you any day.
Citigroup Stock Proving Irresistible to Hedge Funds (Update2)
Share Business ExchangeTwitterFacebook| Email | Print | A A A
By Nikolaj Gammeltoft and Whitney Kisling
Feb. 17 (Bloomberg) -- Firms run by John Paulson, Eric Mindich and George Soros purchased almost half a billion shares in Citigroup Inc. last quarter as more than 120 hedge funds said they bought stock in the bank.
Paulson & Co. reported a stake equal to 506.7 million shares in New York-based Citigroup, up from about 300 million at the end of the third quarter, according to a government filing yesterday. Mindichâs Eton Park Capital Management LP acquired 138 million shares, making the company its largest holding. Soros Fund Management LLC reported 94.7 million shares worth $313.4 million, a filing showed.
Investors may be betting on a rebound in Citigroup after it lost as much as 94 percent of its value during the credit crisis. The purchases came in the same quarter that the third- largest U.S. financial company sold more than 5 billion new shares to help repay government bailouts.
âIt clearly doesnât take a lot to get a decent amount of shares in Citi,â said Christian Thwaites, president and chief executive officer of Sentinel Investments in Montpelier, Vermont, which manages $23 billion. âIf the hedge funds are taking any position in it, itâs a feeling that there might be some value to be had.â
Citigroup stock bought by hedge funds outnumbered the amount sold by a ratio of more than 10 to 1 in the October-to- December period, with about 1.2 billion shares added on a net basis, according to Securities and Exchange Commission filings compiled by Bloomberg.
Tepper, Berkowitz, Loeb
David Tepperâs Appaloosa Management LP increased its stake by 73 percent, adding 58.4 million shares during the fourth quarter. Tepper, whose flagship Appaloosa Investment LP I fund achieved a 117.3 percent return for the nine months through Sept. 30, began buying bank-related securities early last year, saying people were âin a panic,â driving the stocks to underpriced levels. Appaloosa Management wasnât available by phone and didnât immediately respond to an email.
Fairholme Capital Management LLC run by Bruce R. Berkowitz, named U.S. stock mutual-fund manager of the decade last month, bought 214.7 million shares valued at $710.7 million. Hedge fund manager Daniel Loebâs 15-year-old Third Point LLC also took a new position, adding 25 million shares worth $82.8 million. Soros Fund, Fairholme Capital and Third Point didnât respond to messages left after normal business hours yesterday.
The shares traded for an average of $4.10 in the quarter, 24 percent above its closing price yesterday of $3.31, data compiled by Bloomberg show. The company had 28.5 billion shares outstanding as of Dec. 31, the data show. Citigroup gained 3 percent to $3.41 in New York trading today.
Paulson, who earned about $2 billion last year in part by betting the housing market would collapse, started buying his Citigroup stake in the third quarter. His New York-based firm manages about $32 billion overall. Armel Leslie, a spokesman for Paulson, declined to comment.
Eton Park, the New York-based firm founded in 2004 by former Goldman Sachs Group Inc. executive Mindich, said its stake in the bank was valued at $457 million as of Dec. 31, according to a filing. Mary Beth Grover, a spokeswoman for Eton Park, declined to comment.
Money managers who oversee more than $100 million in equities must file a Form 13F within 45 days of each quarterâs end to list their U.S.-traded stocks, options and convertible bonds. Hedge funds are mostly private pools of capital whose managers participate substantially in the profits from speculating on whether the price of assets will rise or fall.
Citigroup posted a $7.6 billion fourth-quarter loss on costs to exit the U.S. bailout program, giving the company its second straight unprofitable year. Chief Executive Officer Vikram S. Pandit booked an $8 billion pretax charge when he repaid $20 billion of bailout funds in December. Revenue missed analystsâ estimates as trading results fell from the third quarter, helping push the shares down 9.3 percent from their 2010 high.
âThe stock has been beaten up,â said Matt McCormick, a banking-industry analyst and portfolio manager at Bahl & Gaynor Inc. in Cincinnati, which oversees $2.7 billion. âThe bad news has been priced in.â
Taxpayers still own 7.7 billion Citigroup shares, and Pandit failed to restore the bank to profitability in his second full year in the top job. The 53-year-old took over in December 2007 following the ouster of Charles O. âChuckâ Prince.
Citigroup is forecast to earn 9 cents a share this year, or 2 percent of what it made in 2005, based on Bloombergâs analyst survey. Thatâs partly because Citigroup has had to issue almost 23 billion new shares to bolster a weakened capital base. Investors who were shareholders prior to the financial crisis were left with about one-fifth their original stakes.
Hedge funds may be speculating on a break-up of Citigroup into individual businesses, according to Diane Garnick, a New York-based investment strategist at Invesco Ltd., which manages about $400 billion.
âThe sum of the parts is worth less than each individual part,â said Garnick. âIt is easier for investors to assign value to a company if it is broken up into its many component parts. In this market environment people are starting to reward single business unit companies.â
That data is circa 2009. And six months later, they don't look so bright.
Separate names with a comma.