WTF does Yang Mills have to do with market-prediction? Does application of Yang Mills prohibit your use of line breaks?
Oh those important line breaks My God how could I forget I should be so focused on that rather than making the statement that has meaning that would be interrupted by my f****** around with this damn s*** on this phone to get your stupid line break to satisfy some guy named poopy. Yang Mills is a theory of all that can possibly happen pretty much , it does not account for gravity but one would think that a theory of everything includes as a subset all the crap that happens in the market and it cannot be expected to be put into a set of words that you would comprehend if you are not deeply immersed in this topic and even though I am I would still be bewildered because if you go and look at the paper entitled towards non-perturbative quantization of Yang Mills fields published just two years ago or so you would find things that are indeed extremely abstract so the only way it would really help predict the market per se as if you incidentally used some of these structures in your code that was also used for trading or used insights derived from this such as knowledge in the field of chemistry which this is a super set of which might give you some insight on to something or the other but really not much other than me getting half a million for it splitting it with the theorist who did the heavy lifting on that part or a may usher in an end to the era of ignorance that mankind has languished in that in, lacking a unified theory of nature thus far compounding present day problems and failing to deliver the promised fusions just 20 years away always type of thing Yang Mills is essentially a theory of all possible occurrences, though it doesn't account for gravity. One might expect a theory of everything to encompass all phenomena, including market dynamics, as a subset. However, it's not something that can be easily explained unless you're deeply immersed in the topic. Even for those who are, like myself, it's still bewildering. Take the paper "Towards non-perturbative quantization of Yang Mills fields" published about two years ago - you'd find extremely abstract concepts there. The theory's practical application to market prediction would likely be incidental, perhaps through the use of certain structures in trading algorithms or insights derived from it. For instance, knowledge from chemistry, which is a subset of this theory, might provide some relevant insights. Realistically, the immediate benefit might be the half-million dollar prize, split with the theorist who did the heavy lifting. More broadly, it could usher in the end of mankind's era of ignorance, addressing our current lack of a unified theory of nature. This could potentially help solve present-day problems and finally deliver on long-promised breakthroughs like fusion energy, which has perpetually been "just 20 years away."
https://news.yahoo.com/2-renowned-strategists-us-defend-013002993.html Terrance McKenna said either he himself originated it or he quoted someone else saying it but he said history is a race between education and disaster
I was actually doing that at the time . well not yet anyway. Did you know that Kamala Harris has a half uncle who taught physics for 13 years? At the same university somewhere in the Caribbean as her father who was apparently his half brother. Even before I made this breakthrough I had a very set of unusual circumstances that led to us meeting and then he said well if you need an audience... I could probably arrange one with my niece and anyway this was after a profound lecture out of the blue he dropped on me after I approached him thinking I don't really know what I thought or expected when this happened but it turned out to be an interesting event and anyway after he discussed the physics topic which was profound and correct based on my understanding of the topics he was referring to he told me the things about how they related and anyway after talking to me he expressed his desire to return to academia and that he was pretty proficient and super conductivity but it was very unusual circumstances and he said something to me also that another guy had randomly met a week prior had told me as well which was very strange and specific statement to have come at me from two different people of very accomplished backgrounds. I was just pointing out the appearance of that article it was not coinciding The need for the things I'm referring to has always been there and this doesn't change any of that. Well let's just say the possibility has always been there and the need was created whenever humans appeared not even sure it was a concept before then. His wife had died apparently and so this is why he was not actively teaching and pretty bummed out. I hope to run into him again. At the time I thought it was absurd I wouldn't have anything to say except Good luck lady the world is a mess but after I came through and I made this breakthrough I thought holy crap this actually might turn into something and actually be what I think it is and even if it's only 20% of what I think it could be that is still revolutionary so thank you for your grass touching ideas that was pretty apropos giving my activity at the time are you spying on me? If you want to hire someone to follow me around with the keyboard and type all this stuff out for me that would be great otherwise probably won't happen unless I just happen to be feeling good and sitting in front of the damn keyboard at the time when my back get decides to be f***** up
Great question. I am very eager to complete the arduous task I am currently finishing up. As soon as that is done it will not take me long to implement the solution to the quadratic rough Heston process which is the first model to jointly calibrate to the index and its corresponding volatility index jointly with continuous sample paths. I settle upon the spectral Jacoby tau method whereby you compute the solution to the fractional ricatti equation by expanding the solution in terms of the (shifted) Jacobi polynomials. Interestingly I could not find any papers that specifically tied this solution technique to this particular equation. We simply do not know what institutions and other participants in this sector of the market use as far as their volatility models but that matters not to me given that this model calibrates perfectly and parsimoniously and I can solve it with a very elegant and efficient method that is great both theoretically and for practical computational concerns it took a while to drive this because all the academic papers use completely unrealistic methods that would never work you can definitely tell some of these folks never traded at all but that does not detract from the applicability of models I'm referring to because academia is a rather diverse place apparently. I'm just an outsider that really digs SCI-HUB. My first approach at implementing this model used numerical techniques and even if they were not unstable due to fixed point arithmetic they would take centuries to price options you'd have to buy a freaking cluster or rent half of Amazon to compute the option prices that way. That's when I embarked upon the ARB4J project which is actually quite awesome by now and has capabilities that you cannot even purchase any commercial product (as far as I am aware was publicly available as of the last time I checked a few months ago). Feel free to check it out. If you want to use it for trading whoever it is will definitely be required to purchase a license from me and it reverts to open source in 4 years. Details are in the license file of the project. I will have a companion library that will implement these techniques that would be of interest to anyone that wants to price options or futures I suppose it could also be applied and depending on the case I would also implement models on a custom basis. I guess the fancy way of saying this would be, bespoke. The companion library will not be even business source licensed the buyer will just know it's awesome by virtue of the fact of its capabilities and also the author having provided a proof of the Riemann hypothesis using the same framework would also provide much exposure I suppose. Well I wouldn't sell any packages that I didn't use myself for real trading. I'm not quite to the point where I tell BlackRock that if they don't get this then Morgan Stanley's going to have it and they will be at a competitive disadvantage ✍️ The wall of secrecy in Wall Street might be a hindrance in the regard that they might due to ego claim that they have and implementation of The thing I've produced but who knows there are many firms out there just got to be at least a few buyers.VIX is a huge market. Voice recognizer sucks. Open AIs voice recognition is stellar they should sell a subscription service to that as an Android plugin so you can just use it in place of this Samsung or Google crap