Your circle jerk peer review is not science, it is a bunch of scientists practicing demagoguery.... Real science does not require peer review, only scientific fact... Peer review doesn't diminish subjectivity, it brings a pack mentality to what should never be influence by human nature... Any idea, theory, or argument's truth and soundness should never be determined by the popular opinion of a peer group...
How do we know what scientific fact is ? 1. Predictions made on the basis of hypothesis are confirmed by observation 2. Weight of evidence confirmed by observation, How do we know the observation is conducted using sound methods, the data analysis is correct, what is actually measured is what is claimed to be measured, the maths is sound etc etc. Hmmm ..... because it is peer reviewed by those qualified to do so.
Instrumentation, application of rigid rules, all reasonable human beings can see it... Facts would never be determined by a group of peers only... You are confusing scientific methods for the opinion making of an elite group...which promotes elitist thinking. It is no different in principle to the Catholic church when the peer review process of theirs elects a new pope...
Okay, have at it: Since you don't trust scientists, either accept or dispute the claim. And please do so with substance rather than just "feel."
"...These data demonstrate that earth's entire history is young, within a few thousand of years..." These data? LOL!!! Any moron can look at the Grand Canyon and figure out it is not just a few thousand years old...