Peter Strzok shits on latest nothing burger

Discussion in 'Politics' started by Cuddles, Jul 12, 2018.

  1. Almost certainly. That's why drive-by posts pose the least risk.
     
    #81     Jul 13, 2018
    Slartibartfast likes this.
  2. Max E.

    Max E.

    If anyone actually thought strzok came off looking like anything more than a smug jackass then i guess we werent watching the same thing. His body language towards dems and republicans was totally obvious if you thought he was biased before im not sure how scenes like this would make him seem to not have a favourite side.

     
    #82     Jul 13, 2018
    Arnie and Poindexter like this.
  3. Creepy looking person.
     
    #83     Jul 13, 2018
    Max E. likes this.
  4. Max E.

    Max E.


    He kind of reminds me of martin skrelli in the creepiness factor.
     
    #84     Jul 13, 2018
    Optionpro007 likes this.
  5. Then how do you explain Tom B? ;)

    Anyway, I'm having leftover roast chicken and wedges for breakfast so either I'm pregnant or I'm out of sorts. I just had that WTF does anything matter feeling after yesterday's various travesty events. Why not have a roast chicken breakfast? :)

    breakfast.jpg
     
    #85     Jul 13, 2018
  6. He had already gone through eleven hours with the same clowns in private session. He was being asked the same questions for the benefit of Fox news.What was on his face was 'this kangaroo mo-fo is spinning xyz from the private session'.

    He did pretty well not bursting out laughing at the travesty.

    The best way to deal with a gang of thugs is to seem a little amused and not at all worried.
     
    #86     Jul 13, 2018
    Cuddles and Frederick Foresight like this.
  7. You guys happen to get a look at Trey Gowdy? Surely you appreciate the symmetry of an asshole looking like he does.
     
    #87     Jul 13, 2018
    Cuddles and Slartibartfast like this.
  8. piezoe

    piezoe

    This was UsualName's post :
    " Trump is being investigated because he was up to his eyeballs in Russian sympathizers in his campaign while Russia itself was actively working to get him elected."

    You responded like a hermit whose been living in the trees the past two years:
    "
    If there was any evidence whatsoever, we would know about it. 'Wishing for' evidence is not the same as 'having' evidence. Your guys TDS has really affected your ability to think objectively, imo."

    To which I'll add that if you think no evidence is needed by a Grand Jury to bring an indictment, you are even more dense than I thought. Eleven Russians have already been indicted for interfering in the 2016 election!

    Trump has not been indicted yet! But he has surrounded himself with those who have , and five of these folks have already pleaded guilty to various crimes and civil offenses. You and I have no knowledge of the evidence Mueller has against Trump himself. And contrary to what you stated, you wouldn't know about it. But unlike you, I am not stupid. Mr. Trump's crimes, at a minimum, will be tax evasion and money laundering -- for the latter there is a mountain of publicly available evidence has high as Everest.. He may also be indicted in New York after he is out of office. If Mueller subpoenas him, I will be able to add perjury to his other offenses.

    Trump has surrounded himself with criminals from Putin on down. Among those, there have been at least 20 indictments (I think it may actually be 23) and 5 guilty pleas, so far. Those folks are either already singing like canaries, or soon will be. Trump can't pardon them because they would lose their 5th amendment privilege and have to testify or be jailed in contempt of court. Why do you think Trump hasn't pardoned them before now? And he is not going to. No President will pardon someone who has information that could put them in jail.

    The Congress won't need any of Mueller's charges to impeach and convict trump of high crimes and misdemeanors. They can easily get rid of him for violations of the Emollients Clause in the Constitution, which in Trumps case is a trivial matter to prove.
     
    Last edited: Jul 13, 2018
    #88     Jul 13, 2018
    Slartibartfast likes this.
  9. There is no explaining Tom B.

    Chicken and roasted potatoes for breakfast? Looks good, but it might be a bit over the top.
     
    #89     Jul 13, 2018
    Slartibartfast likes this.
  10. You had at me 'hello'...:D

    You have no evidence Trump himself colluded with Russia. Your TDS response is irrelevant.
     
    #90     Jul 13, 2018
    elderado likes this.