What fascinated me is the CANSLIM numbers. It is one of the classic methods that I never delved into. Interesting to note, it's popularity led to revisions that made the performance worse. Perhaps, it's coincidental to the time frame chosen. I think not. I think it is a case of over fitting to the popular themes at the time of revision. Btw, the first edition is $.01 used in Amazon. A likely collectible. I also found the 1987 Cox and Rubinstein for $20. Leather bound and most likely smells of Oak and 18 year old scotch.
Why are you dividing by 7? It has been 16 years since start of 2001. If S&P 500 was 1350 in 2001, then being 2259 now is a 3% return on just the price part during that period.
Even the real George Sorros hangs out here , real traders need 3$ an hour asrseheads to start threads "forex is great , you suckers reading should trade forex with buckets shops paying my $3 for 50 posts or rebate broker sending goons to say "Day trading is great " , we pay rebates if get suckers day trading. You have all the real traders calling themselvers TRADER , MIT TRADER (mohamed islam trader M I T) http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/art...g-pushed-pushed-reporter-finally-gave-in.html