What if the price action and the direction of every Market were perfectly readable. Then "Predicting " the direction of the Market would be unnecessary. A trader would only need to "See" the direction the Market was going and take it. Think about this. What is perfect in every Market is Price. It is totally incorruptable. Price is cyclical and oscillates with perfection as well. It's perfect oscillation is from its last bottom (Support) to its last top (Resistance) and from its last top (Resistance) to its last bottom (Support). What are the only things perfect about a cycle? Tops, Bottoms and the constant and consistent oscillation between the two. Guess what? If you believe the Market perfectly oscillates between tops and bottoms then all you need to trade perfectly is a way to "Clearly See" both the extreme and minor tops and bottoms in the Market and a way to perfectly confirm each top or bottom has completed and is on its way to retest its sequential cyclical partner. I know this thread will generate a ton of opinions but what I'm looking for is PROOF that this is a wrong assumption. What you must prove is that; the Market is not cyclical, the Market can create back-to-back Support levels without a Resistance level in-between, the Market can create back-to-back Resistance levels without a Support level in-between or the Market doesn't do anything at each top or bottom, either extreme or minor to confirm its completed that part of the cycle. Seem simple . . . well, to copy the Nike commercial then . . . "Just do it". Put your "Proof" as a response to this thread. If your "Proof" is something that a picture is required to prove your point, then include it. Random statements without something to back it up will only make you look silly. Let's have fun doing this . . . YOU WILL LEARN SOMETHING! I will respond to answer all "Proof" statements. There are a few members of ET that make a point of skewing threads to become a forum for themselves. Watch this thread to see the transition of thought and responses.