Perfect example of why Al Brooks is impossible to follow

Discussion in 'Educational Resources' started by ChkitOut, Mar 31, 2013.

  1. tobbe

    tobbe

    Surf, seriously, why do you keep posting blatant lies?

    The only thing that happens is you lose credibility.
     
    #61     Apr 1, 2013
  2. What are you talking about? If nodojo ever posted a statement of any kind, I have never seen it. If I am wrong, link please, and I'll gladly retract--- However, if you can't , you are the ONE who is lying.

    surf
     
    #62     Apr 1, 2013
  3. jnbadger

    jnbadger

    But why do you feel this intense desire to doubt? Yes, there is a lot of bullshit on this board, but I've Skyped with her, and she knows her stuff.

    And the idea of posting statements online is just stupid. Grow up.
     
    #63     Apr 1, 2013
  4. She is a kind lady, no doubt about it. However,there is zero evidence for her ability just like the others.

    surf
     
    #64     Apr 1, 2013
  5. I`ve skyped with one famous fund manager,too.Now his fund is -30% between the bottomline.You know,that line that separates two buttocks.
     
    #65     Apr 1, 2013
  6. The evidence is there.The evidence shows that 99% of the 20 EMA/1-min chart are in the deep...well...whatever.And that is the undeniable fact.Hard facts,hard numbers.Numbers don`t lie,usually.Maybe ND is unique in this sense,along with Cornix.
     
    #66     Apr 1, 2013
  7. jnbadger

    jnbadger

    Nor is there any proof of yours.
     
    #67     Apr 1, 2013
  8. What lies, specifically?

    So she hasn't shown a blotter, but it shouldn't matter anyway? All of these clowns suffer from this hyperbolic-nonsense. "My friend does 10 points a day consistently" and "I make 9x the margin requirement in the CL" and shit to that effect.

    Where's the beef?

    Funny, but the guys who makes millions in vol-futures (sellindexvol66 and another poster who be ticked at my inference) on here and produce blotters to that effect have never crowed about how many multiples they can produce on their AUM. No corollary w.r.t. these Brooks' acolytes. I wonder why? Worried about IP theft I suppose.
     
    #68     Apr 1, 2013
  9. jnbadger

    jnbadger

    Exactly. Donna has never claimed anything, but she has helped many. But then you have total dickheads like MS who want to hate just for the sake of hating. It's so transparent, it's comical.
     
    #69     Apr 1, 2013
  10. It seems that it is YOU who is a total dick,for writting the stuff like that!Has never claimed anything,BUT,she has helped so many!:D :D :D

    That`s about the dumbest line i ever read on ET!
     
    #70     Apr 1, 2013