Pelosi Impeachment Inquiry

Discussion in 'Politics' started by Big AAPL, Sep 24, 2019.

  1. UsualName

    UsualName

    Buddy, your missing one small detail, Trumps own inspector general determined the complaint to be urgent and credible. What are you arguing?
     
    #671     Oct 11, 2019
  2. We need to examine this person to clear up any questions that you may have.

    gig.
     
    #672     Oct 11, 2019
  3. UsualName

    UsualName

    I don’t need to work on anything. This not an overly technical process. Have info on wrongdoing, report wrong doing to IG.

    Done in complete compliance and deemed uregwnt and credible. What you guys are arguing is totally made up nonsense.

    The whistleblower in this case has no material evidence, what purpose as a witness would they serve?

    I think you guys are mixing this up with a criminal complaint. These two things are not the same.
     
    #673     Oct 11, 2019
  4. kingjelly

    kingjelly

    The whole point of having whistleblowers is to protect them from the powerful people they accuse. Anonymous witnesses are allowed in trials as long as prosecutors can prove that testimony puts them in danger, I think the most powerful man in the world with a pattern of seeking revenge who is also over the agency you work for qualifies.
     
    #674     Oct 11, 2019
    Cuddles likes this.

  5. So he determined that it needed to be brought forth, which he did.

    Now we want to examine it and the supporting allegations and the people making them.
     
    #675     Oct 11, 2019
  6. The Senate can rule on all of your concerns if the ukraine scenario is part of the impeachment charges.
     
    #676     Oct 11, 2019
  7. smallfil

    smallfil

    Democrats until now refuse to vote for impeachment in an effort to try this by publicity without casting any actual votes which would be on record! It is also, an effort to deny President Donald Trump of due process and they run it like the communist kangaroo courts! US voters will not forget this come November 8, 2020!
     
    #677     Oct 11, 2019
  8. UsualName

    UsualName

    Well we know you want to examine the whistleblower because you think by attacking their character it will undermine the complaint but that is precisely why they are protected.

    If this whistleblower is outed through anyone but themselves the whistleblower act is basically void. No one will report corruption if it is a guarantee that their life will be completely destroyed.

    We need federal employees to safely be able to report abuses and for that to happen they must be protected.
     
    #678     Oct 11, 2019
  9. UsualName

    UsualName

    No. The senate should follow the law.
     
    #679     Oct 11, 2019

  10. Yes, I want to develop complete knowledge of the origins and motivations and connections and background of the spy.
     
    #680     Oct 11, 2019
    Tsing Tao likes this.