TLDR: he cannot name one democrat an impeachment inquiry helps. I shall open this question to the class now that treetard has proven he says things he hears on Fox News without thinking about them: Can anyone name one democrat impeachment helps?
What a crock CNN is. They captioned this article about Adam Schiff as though he had done something positive. Even the lefty Washinton Post reported that they gave Schiff 4 Pinnochios. Schiff lied through his sorry arse and got caught. Schiff cleans up after saying committee had no contact with whistleblower https://www.cnn.com/2019/10/03/politics/adam-schiff-whistleblower-timeline/index.html
Well the Trump Administration is saying this morning that unless there is a full House vote to initiate impeachment hearings they will not regard any subpoena, inquiry or requests for information to be valid and they will not comply with them. No member of the administration will appear before any committee. The reason, primarily, is that after the House votes to initiate hearings the Republicans are then allowed to call witnesses, question witnesses, introduce material into the record etc. Its only fair and it has been the precedent in 4 previous impeachment proceedings. Fish or cut bait Nancy.
Now that is a damn sensible argument. Good on you! Too bad the democrats aren’t going to do any of that. They want this process done quick fast and they learned from Mitch McConnell, fcuk the Norma if it ain’t in the rules we don’t have to do it so bite me.
You can't have an impeachment vote without impeachment hearings and you can't have impeachment hearings without a full House vote to have impeachment hearings. See how that works? Pesky rules.
Again, just point to where it says that in the constitution or congressional rules one time for all of us and this convo will be over.