Pelosi Impeachment Inquiry

Discussion in 'Politics' started by Big AAPL, Sep 24, 2019.

  1. Reply is inline below:

    ="Here4money, post: 5001097, member: 496573"]You don't get a defense when cops are gathering evidence for your crimes unless it's done by illegal means. Best you can do is keep your mouth shut and stay out of the cops way. You get a defense at trial. Retards I swear...
    Where charges are effectively a hunting expedition for evidence, the other side is under no obligation to cooperate. Indeed, the act of basically falsely accusing someone is a serious crime in of itself.

    thought you were going to save us the trouble of scrolling through your diatribes by promising a last post several posts ago?
    “Diatribes”? Impressive characterization, you got there. Personally, I prefer “Insightful analysis by a freedom loving patriot who respects the rights of others”.

    As far as my “no more posting promise”, I lied. Don’t do it often, but I was weak. That is why I originally asked the moderators to suspend my account and asked Tony Stark to follow up on my request. Something about leaving a loaded gun on the kitchen table to look at every day... Anyways, I back in a much more limited way than before. Maybe just a few posts on the weekend is all. It’s not like I’m an addict looking for a fix. No really. I hope.


    Coming across as a flip flopper man.
    Not exactly a devastating comment from you and the hypocrisy often associated with Leftist politics.


    Hell, I think I even gave you a like and shit.
    Does this mean I owe you? Are you Hillary, or something? Would me never posting again at least partially satisfy my “debt” to you? How should we handle the multiple likes I have given you?

    Hopefully the boiler supplying the heat to the radiator in your 400sf Soviet era apartment does not break down this cold Winter. Losing you as a poster would make our day less interesting.
     
    #2371     Jan 26, 2020
  2. When you got nothing you start seizing upon how white Trump's defense team is.

    What Toobin is really saying is: "We know this whole scam is about the 2020 election and we know we are going to lose in the Senate anyway so we went full-diversity because that is what you do when it is just about the election."

    Get ready for the big 24/7 argument that Trump was acquitted by an all white jury. That will be their mantra. All the dems including the tards here will be self-stimulating to that zippy little assertion. Watch them all slide under the table though when you ask them why their party just ran a primary process that had a wide range of diversity and the first thing they did was to sift out any candidate who was not an old white fuddy-duddy. WOMP....womp......womp.

    CNN's Jeffrey Toobin complains about 'white men' filling Trump's legal team


    https://www.foxnews.com/media/cnn-analyst-complains-about-white-men-filling-trumps-legal-team
     
    Last edited: Jan 26, 2020
    #2372     Jan 26, 2020
    Ayn Rand likes this.
  3. Cuddles

    Cuddles

    Just come out already laces, no need to stay upset

     
    Last edited: Jan 26, 2020
    #2373     Jan 26, 2020
  4. Black_Cat

    Black_Cat

    zxhl3hdjds.png
     
    #2374     Jan 26, 2020
    elderado, Optionpro007 and smallfil like this.
  5. Cuddles

    Cuddles


    More "unverified" rumors confirmed.
    inb4 redhats say Trump didn't even know Parnas

     
    #2375     Jan 26, 2020
  6. LacesOut

    LacesOut

    Thanks again for posting complete and utter rumor and innuendo. It’s not much different than the Russia bullshit you’ve been posting for years.
     
    #2376     Jan 26, 2020
  7. LacesOut

    LacesOut

    LOL. Get rid of her - almost a year before Biden is running for office.
    This blows the entire retarded Dem lie-orama apart.
    You know who can fire ambassadors for any reason?
    This guy:
    upload_2020-1-26_15-48-3.jpeg
     
    #2377     Jan 26, 2020
  8. Cuddles

    Cuddles

    It's almost as if DC has insider knowledge of who's likely to run for campaigns
     
    #2378     Jan 26, 2020
  9. LacesOut

    LacesOut

    Can’t be corrupt, nor can you investigate potential corruption, if you MAY or MAY NOT run for POTUS, he said...

    HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAHHAHAAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAH
     
    #2379     Jan 26, 2020
  10. UsualName

    UsualName

    There is no argument over whether Trump broke the law, abused public office, or is completely corrupt - including many members of the cabinet. He’s straight up guilty. No one can deny it.

    Adam Schiff is right, Nancy Pelosi is right and so is every house member that voted for impeachment. It’s a fact now.

    https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/poli...quiries-he-sought-bolton-book-says/ar-BBZlMfy

    It does not get bigger than this:

    “In his August 2019 discussion with Mr. Bolton, the president appeared focused on the theories Mr. Giuliani had shared with him, replying to Mr. Bolton’s question that he preferred sending no assistance to Ukraine until officials had turned over all materials they had about the Russia investigation that related to Mr. Biden and supporters of Mrs. Clinton in Ukraine.”
     
    #2380     Jan 26, 2020