now it's the democrats' fault. This scum is unbelievable Democrats' smear campaign against Trump sparked White House involvement in Ukraine, Devin Nunes says https://www.foxnews.com/media/trump-ukraine-devin-nunes-mark-levin
Ah, Grade A, patented H4M dodging. You implied it in your statement and when you get caught on it, you back peddle and pretend that isn't what you meant. Its your trademark behavior around here.
The reason they're able to do this in the first place is because there are bad actors on both sides. If Democrats could be trusted to only pursue facts and genuinely were satisfied once these truths were uncovered, then they could be trusted to investigate properly. But there's so much bullshit coming from the left AND the right that no one knows who to trust anymore. Everyone is partisan, everyone is tainted. There are no voices that can be found that are neutral and open to solutions. Just bad actors.
How is calling a democrat that has a history of voting with Republicans, a conservative, back pedaling? I'd love to hear that logic. Thank you for citing the sources where bad actors on the democratic side extorted a foreign power to fabricate dirt on their political opponents.
You didn't bother to look the guy up, you assumed he was a republican. Then, because you simply called him a "conservative" and got called on it, you back peddled and argued semantics to try to give us the impression you felt the man was conservative instead of thinking he was a republican. It would be an honest mistake with most folks, but because you've been so ridiculously disingenuous in the past, no one here believes your bullshit except a few of your drones. Here is the man's voting record. He votes for Trump approved policy about 7.5% of the time, this year alone. Looking at what he actually voted against and what he voted for, you can see he is not a conservative - not even close. https://projects.fivethirtyeight.com/congress-trump-score/jeff-van-drew/ First, you didn't cite any sources in your comment - you just pissed on a foxnews article. Second, any sources I would put out there would immediately be called "fake news" by you, so what would be the point? You've never shown yourself to be even slightly moderate or non-partisan, so attempting honest debate with you is worth fuck-all.
So now you're just a mind reader I see. Classic con believing in superstition. I couldn't possibly be familiar w/the man's voting record on the minimum wage, same sex marriage, greenhouse mitigation initiatives, & pipeline building. I barely called him a conservative, not a traitor, like you guys like to call your RINOs. Not to mention the above is irrelevant. There are plenty of Democrats with wrong opinions who go on FOX, doesn't change the fact that FOX peddles to conservatives and is a conservative outlet, making the whole accusation moot to begin with. So no sources linking Democrats extorting foreign presidents for dirt then? Classic GWB defense.
Peddle peddle peddle. You realize (well, probably YOU don't) that it would have just been easier to go "crap, didn't even realize he was a dem. my bad." But you can never admit you are wrong about, well...anything, can you. If I waste the time and post the examples, will you accept them?
https://www.foxnews.com/media/rep-lee-zeldin-impeachment-hearings-new-development Rep. Lee Zeldin: Upcoming impeachment hearings should be postponed due to new development