Pelosi Impeachment Inquiry

Black_Cat · Nov 8, 2019

Cuddles · Nov 9, 2019

WeToddDid2 said:
So Sondland did the quid pro quo?
More...

hook, line, and sinker; you've fallen for the GOP strategy

Spike Trader · Nov 9, 2019

Trump . . . . . . ''I hardly know the gentleman'' , but i'll gladly take a Million Dollars from him.
No questions asked..

Trump on Gordon Sondland: 'I hardly know the gentleman'

Spike Trader · Nov 9, 2019

It was 'Let the American people decide' . . . . . now it's 'Don't let the American people decide.'

Cuddles · Nov 9, 2019

Here4money said:
https://thehill.com/homenews/admini...-there-was-no-doubt-trump-wanted-quid-pro-quo

NSC official testified there was 'no doubt' Trump pushed quid pro quo

A White House official who was on President Trump's call with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky told Congress there was “no doubt” that Trump had invoked a quid pro quo, according to transcripts released Friday as part of Democrats' impeachment inquiry.

Lt. Col. Alexander Vindman, a Ukraine specialist on the National Security Council (NSC) who was on the controversial July 25 phone call, told House lawmakers the message from Trump was clear.

"The demand was, in order to get the White House meeting, they had to deliver an investigation,” Vindman testified.
That assessment was backed by Fiona Hill, formerly Trump’s top Russia analyst at the NSC, who told lawmakers it was widely understood that investigating Burisma — the Ukrainian energy giant that had employed former Vice President Joe Biden’s son Hunter Biden — was code for investigating the Bidens.

Vindman said Trump mentioned Burisma by name on the July 25 call.

“This is very much repeating things that Rudy Giuliani was saying in public on television,” Hill said.

Both Vindman and Hill told House investigators last month that Giuliani, the president's personal attorney, was a liability to diplomats managing U.S. foreign policy in Kiev — and should therefore be avoided.

Vindman said he told Kurt Volker, former special envoy to Ukraine, on “a couple occasions” that “there was a lot of risk involved with trying to deal with Mr. Giuliani,” according to the transcript of his Oct. 29 deposition.

And Hill said she’d given Volker similar advice, warning it wasn’t “a good idea” to meet with the former New York City mayor, whose multifaceted agenda in Ukraine included efforts to oust a veteran U.S. diplomat; pressure Ukrainian leaders to find dirt on Trump’s political rivals; and drum up business opportunities for his financial partners.

“[Volker] said that he thought that he would be able to … reason with him and to, you know, kind of … manage this,” Hill said. “Well, we did not think that this was manageable.”

That view was shared by John Bolton, Trump’s now-former national security adviser, who had characterized Giuliani as “a hand grenade” who would ultimately “blow everybody up,” Hill testified.

“Ambassador Bolton had said repeatedly that nobody should be meeting with Giuliani,” Hill said during her deposition on Oct. 14.

But the isolation campaign met with limited success for one simple reason: Trump, in an Oval Office meeting in May, had told several top diplomats — including Volker and Gordon Sondland, Trump’s ambassador to the E.U. — that Giuliani would be his point man on Ukrainian policy.

“He just kept saying, ‘Talk to Rudy, talk to Rudy,'” Sondland told lawmakers during his deposition last month.

Volker testified that he did just that, delivering a warning to Giuliani that he shouldn’t trust a former Ukrainian prosecutor, Yuriy Lutsenko, whom the State Department had long considered to be corrupt and self-serving. But the message fell flat, and Giuliani, Volker testified, emerged as “a problem” for diplomats seeking to root out corruption and strengthen ties with Kiev.

“The negative narrative about Ukraine which Mr. Giuliani was furthering was the problem,” Volker testified on Oct. 3. “It was impeding our ability to build the relationship the way we should be doing.”

The new details emerged this week as Democrats leading the impeachment investigation shift from weeks of closed-door depositions to a public phase of the process, to feature several televised hearings next week. As part of that transition, they’re releasing the verbatim transcripts of the 15 witness depositions they’ve conducted privately since the inquiry was launched on Sept. 24.

The transcripts for Vindman and Hill were the latest releases in that process. Both of them provided new ammunition for Democrats, who have accused Trump of abusing his office in pressing Zelensky to open investigations into the 2016 elections and Biden — both of which would have helped Trump politically heading into the 2020 elections.

Aside from his association with Lutsenko, Giuliani was also in contact with John Solomon, an opinion columnist, formerly with The Hill, who wrote a series of pieces earlier this year promoting allegations of corruption by former Vice President Joe Biden, as well as debunked theories that it was Ukraine, not Russia, that had interfered in the 2016 elections.

Another Solomon column, based on an interview with Lutsenko, accused Marie Yovanovitch, the former U.S. ambassador to Ukraine, of providing Lutsenko with a “do-not-prosecute” list. Vindland testified that there wasn’t a shred of truth to that account.

"All the key elements were false,” he said.

Hill also testified that Giuliani — along with a pair of business partners with Ukrainian ties, Lev Parnas and Igor Fruman — were tapping Giuliani’s proximity to Trump in order to boost their own financial prospects.

“My view in looking at this, is that individuals — private individuals like Mr. Giuliani and his business associates — are trying to appropriate presidential power or the authority of the president, given the position that Mr. Giuliani is in, to also pursue their own personal interests,” she said.

Giuliani was also eroding morale in the State Department, multiple diplomats have testified, particularly after he helped to orchestrate the removal of Yovanovitch, who was recalled to Washington in May. Hill called it “a real turning point” for the diplomatic corps.

“There was no basis for her removal,” Hill testified. “The accusations against her had no merit whatsoever. This was a mishmash of conspiracy theories.”

Giuliani’s attorneys did not respond Friday to questions seeking comment.
More...

TreeFrogTrader · Nov 9, 2019

Howz that impeachment coming along?

Got Trump removed yet?

Or you have to wait until March?

TreeFrogTrader · Nov 9, 2019

Facebook scrubbing 'any and all mentions' of alleged whistleblower Eric Ciaramella

Gets to be absurd after a while.

https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/...alleged-whistleblowers-name-from-the-platform

Cuddles · Nov 10, 2019

Spike Trader said:
It was 'Let the American people decide' . . . . . now it's 'Don't let the American people decide.'

View attachment 213050
More...

get ready to change "no quid pro quo" to "no extortion"
https://www.axios.com/eric-swalwell...eme-88b6af89-1c2b-4c4c-9e99-f6bfff0c649e.html

Swalwell says House Intel has evidence of Trump-Ukraine "extortion scheme"
Rep. Eric Swalwell (D-Calif.), a member of the House Intelligence Committee, told CBS' Margaret Brennan on Sunday that the impeachment inquiry has uncovered evidence of an "extortion scheme" involving President Trump withholding military aid to Ukraine to pressure its government to investigate his political opponents.

"It's important that the president has due process. And evidence is not a conclusion. We have enough evidence from the depositions that we've done to warrant bringing this forward. Evidence of an extortion scheme, using taxpayer dollars to ask a foreign government to investigate the president's opponent. But it's important that the people raise their right hands and face questions from both Democrats and Republicans. The president is going to get that."— Swalwell

Why it matters: The impeachment inquiry is moving into its public phase this week, with three witnesses — top U.S. diplomat in Ukraine Bill Taylor, State Department official George Kent and former Ambassador to Ukraine Marie Yovanovitch — expected to testify in open session.

Democrats believe they already have enough evidence to impeach Trump and sent the case to the Senate for a trial, even without hearing from the White House witnesses who have refused to cooperate with the inquiry.

Witnesses acknowledge that there appeared to be a quid pro quo involving a White House visit for Ukraine’s president, conditioned on the announcement of investigations into Joe and Hunter Biden and the 2016 election.

They differ on whether military aid was also used as leverage. But key diplomats intimately involved in discussions with Ukraine, including Taylor and EU Ambassador Gordon Sondland, believe it was.

Black_Cat · Nov 10, 2019

WeToddDid2 · Nov 10, 2019

Rand Paul destroys the impeachment and qid pro quo bullshit political propaganda from the left.
Apparently, following the law is considered illegal by libtards. Furthermore, libtards clearly want two standards of law. One for dems and one for repubs.

Good taste of what will happen in the senate. Can't wait for the Biden's to be questioned on live TV.