Pelosi eliminating 401k in lieu of government retirement?

Discussion in 'Wall St. News' started by clacy, Oct 24, 2008.

  1. clacy

    clacy

    If I recall correctly, Pelosi recently has made comments regarding disbanding 401k plans in lieu of a government forced retirement program (seperate from SS obviously).

    Does anyone have any links or direct quotes?

    Does that sound familiar, or am I just having Democrat anxiety disorder and dreaming up scenarios that she, Reid and Barack will take my freedoms? :p
     
  2. dsss27

    dsss27

  3. Says a lot when the gov't feels the need to force people to save for their retirements.

    It's one extreme to the next - fund it yourself or we'll force you like it or not.
     
  4. She's well taken care of......

    Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi’s home district includes San Francisco.

    Star-Kist Tuna’s headquarters are in San Francisco, Pelosi’s home district.

    Star-Kist is owned by Del Monte Foods and is a major contributor to Pelosi.

    Star-Kist is the major employer in American Samoa employing 75% of the Samoan workforce.

    Paul Pelosi, Nancy’s husband, owns $17 million dollars of Star-Kist stock.

    In January, 2007 when the minimum wage was increased from $5.15 to $7.25, Pelosi had American Samoa exempted from the increase so Del Monte would not have to pay the higher wage. This would make Del Monte products less expensive than their competitions.

    Last week when the huge bailout bill was passed, Pelosi added an earmark to the final bill adding $33 million dollars for an ‘economic development credit in American Samoa.’

    Pelosi says...Republicans are corrupt.
     
  5. new$

    new$

  6. Cesko

    Cesko

    Under Ghilarducci’s plan, all workers would receive a $600 annual inflation-adjusted subsidy from the U.S. government but would be required to invest 5 percent of their pay into a guaranteed retirement account administered by the Social Security Administration.
     
  7. Cesko

    Cesko

    Under Ghilarducci’s plan, all workers would receive a $600 annual inflation-adjusted subsidy from the U.S. government but would be required to invest 5 percent of their pay into a guaranteed retirement account administered by the Social Security Administration.

    O my God what else is coming? How is this all gonna end?
     
  8. with the govt looting a larger trust fund pool to spend more and stuffing it in return with more "special" non-marketable I.O.U.s.
     
  9. clacy

    clacy

    Hammer & Sickle?
     
  10. Funny how this gets little media coverage, but instead we're forced to read about really important issues like how much Sarah Palin spent on plane tickets/dresses.
     
    #10     Oct 24, 2008