PDT Rule & Prop Firms

Discussion in 'Prop Firms' started by tito, Mar 10, 2008.

  1. let your friend "join the exchange"? that confirms what MAV has been saying all along.
     
    #301     Mar 23, 2008
  2. LOL.. you don't even know what your point is.
     
    #302     Mar 23, 2008
  3. Joab

    Joab

    5Pillars - roflmao that post cracked me up

    Mav - thanks for "trying" to help but you know this crowd.




    I think the BIGGER issue for us as traders is NOT just saving our own butt.

    BUT (pun)

    If we lose all the prop shops, volume will dry up huge and that will kill edges for stock traders.

    That is my concern !
     
    #303     Mar 23, 2008
  4. hey thanks a bunch 88! Don you out there? can you shed any light on this?
     
    #304     Mar 23, 2008
  5. Geez, I take 3 days off for Easter, and you guys (not you Steel) are still at it.

    The stock exchanges require a S7, the Cboe had a couple of firms that didn't require because cboe didn't require. That is likely chaning according to my people (merger etc.).

    I don't know anything about grandfathering. We belonged to the Philly when the S7 came into being.

    Don
     
    #305     Mar 24, 2008
  6. your memory is off, my 7 was grandfathered by the philly at Bright in that time period. check with your compliance officer.
     
    #306     Mar 24, 2008
  7. You're probably right then...heck, this is such a minor issue, I haven't kept track for the last decade LOL.

    All the best,

    Don
     
    #307     Mar 24, 2008
  8. Maverick74

    Maverick74

    Not according to my sources Donny boy. :)
     
    #308     Mar 24, 2008
  9. jd1028

    jd1028

    to all u lazy fucking asssholes that trade 3k out of your mothers basement--TAKE THE FUCKING TEST AND SHUT THE FUCK UP
     
    #309     Mar 24, 2008
  10. jd1028

    jd1028

    AND MY ASSENT OFFICE SHUT DOWN THE LLC TODAY,JUST IN CASE YOU THOUGHT IT WAS ALL A BAD DREAM--TAKE THE TEST
     
    #310     Mar 24, 2008