Except for GW Bush and Clinton he has more experience for the job than any other person alive. So we're not really talking about experience, five years ago yes but not now.
Experience doesn't mean he is the right choice. Saying he is a better choice than anyone alive is more than a bit preposterous.
Oh jeezus, are you fucking serious? Sitting in an operating room doing nothing but watching doesn't make one a surgeon. No matter how long you sit there. Obama was not and even after 4 years of on the job training is STILL not even remotely qualified in any way shape form or fashion to be POTUS.
He has demonstrated that he hasn't learned anything but how to game the system. There is no doubt that Obama is an awful president. He doesn't know how the economy works, he doesn't understand foreign policy and all he promotes are his pet ideological mistakes like amnesty, gun control and socialized medicine. Everything he touches gets screwed up. Where the Hell is the Keystone Pipeline approval? If any one of our Founding Fathers could escape the grave I'm sure they would do away with him by any means.
That is only your opinion, not fact. And it does not have anything to do with my post which you were responding to. Which was about experience which president Obama has more presidential experience than every one except for Bush and Clinton, that is fact.
You're right, of course. Just because someone has been doing something for a while doesn't say anything about their ability or competence compared to another. And, that's especially true of a job that requires a lot of judgment calls. Usually poor judgment doesn't improve that much over time for those who don't have the capacity. Previous successful experience in a business or position requiring judgment is a better indication of ability. Obama has none and continues to show us that that is the case.