Paul keeps white supremacist donation (paul just lost my vote and future donations )

Discussion in 'Politics' started by insider trading, Dec 19, 2007.

  1. achilles28

    achilles28

    Paul explained it very well.


    <object width="425" height="355"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/QqPhrqllHzY&rel=1"></param><param name="wmode" value="transparent"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/QqPhrqllHzY&rel=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" wmode="transparent" width="425" height="355"></embed></object>
     
    #21     Dec 20, 2007
  2. TGregg

    TGregg

    Here's Ron Paul and Don Black, the owner of neo-Nazi hate site Stormfront along with Don's son Derek Black:


    <IMG SRC=http://www.elitetrader.com/vb/attachment.php?s=&postid=1721927>
     
    #22     Dec 20, 2007
  3. dinoman

    dinoman

    Well without all the pandering B.S. that many want to spew to help the MSM.

    Just ask yourself this...

    Would you rather keep money donated from a racists to promote freedom and prosparity than give it back to them to promote the horrible act of racism.

    This is a no brainer for me.

    For those who knock it may just fall into the political B.S. the MSM crams down your throat.

    All the animosity over this just baffles me regardless wether its Ron Paul we are talking about or not.

    If this same thing happend to any other candidate I would TOTALLY back them not giving it back to a racist and putting it towards a good cause that brings us all together.
     
    #23     Dec 20, 2007
  4. LT701

    LT701

    I was at an event very close to Hillary, if I'd really been bent on it, I could have had a picture snapped next to her with me in it.

    Does it mean Hillary shares my views? No, because one of my beliefs is that I cant stand Hillary

    I have reservations about Paul because of his guest worker positions, but there's no evidence here Ron Paul had any idea who this guy is (or that he is even Don Black)

    Politicians meet strangers and get their pictures taken almost continuously during a campaign.

    Go after Paul for legit reasons (I do), but this stuff has no merit
     
    #24     Dec 20, 2007
  5. LOL LOL LOL.... and we can't come up with pics of the Clinton with Drug dealers and murderers? which is worse? wait.. this is the PC era... i know.. murderers are better than white supremacist. tff



    [​IMG]

    The above photo was taken in front of the White House Christmas tree with Hillary and Clinton campaign donor Jorge Cabreras. Jorge is a convicted drug smuggler and friend of Fidel Castro. According to the New York Times, April 4, 1997, Jorge was solicited for his donation by a Democratic operative in the lobby of a hotel in Havana! The $20,000 check to the Clinton campaign came from an account linked to cocaine money. At the time the above photo was taken, Jorge had two felony convictions, but the Secret Service cleared him to enter the White House anyway.
     
    #25     Dec 20, 2007
  6. dinoman

    dinoman

    OH DAMN! Dr. Paul forgot to impliment the Government mandated background check before taking a picture with someone. OOPS my bad that law has'nt gone into effect yet. Maybe in 2009?
     
    #26     Dec 20, 2007
  7. NEXT
     
    #27     Dec 20, 2007
  8. As it was predicted. If Ron Paul became a serious threat, (scared Karl Rove), the smear campaign would go into overdrive. Ignoring him didn't work. Ron Paul is not your enemy. I know it is hard to understand.
     
    #28     Dec 20, 2007
  9. TGregg

    TGregg

    #29     Dec 20, 2007
  10. dinoman

    dinoman

    #30     Dec 20, 2007