I suspect that RFK Jr will be the Democrat nominee for president in 2024. If there is vote cheating in states, then he will likely be the next President.
Something Rumsfeldian is brewing. I am just not sure what it is. I am not convinced yet that Joe is running for a second term. He may have declared just to avoid a long period of being lame duck. Then after the first of the year he steps aside. I don't know. Something weird coming. RFK seems far fetched but if Joe steps down and everyone starts looking at Kamala and Metrosexual Newsome- who is not popular anywhere outside the beltway east of California- then there will be some protest votes going elsewhere for sure. That could be RFK, could be Manchin third party. Don't know. Biden is at risk of making it through the first term.
Just so everyone knows----There is no such thing as fake electors. Congreff either accepts or rejects slates of electors. ---Nothing illegal there.
https://www.hawaiifreepress.com/Art...-Hawaii-Sends-Two-Slates-to-Electoral-College Hawaii was a new state in 1960 holding its first presidential election — a concept that’s also worth remembering as the possibility of adding Puerto Rico and the District of Columbia to the union is portrayed as somehow outrageous. Turnout topped 93 percent in Hawaii. The state’s result was close, just as the nation’s was overall. Nixon initially appeared to be the winner by 141 votes, and the Republican governor declared him the winner. But a judge granted the Kennedy team’s request for a recount. As it dragged on, the judge rejected GOP attempts to stop the count. When the mid-December date came for the Electoral College to meet — this year it’s Dec. 14 — both Republican and Democratic electors sent their votes to Washington to be counted. Kennedy eventually was declared the winner in the Hawaii recount by 115 votes, but the two sets of certifications were waiting when the joint session of Congress convened. Democrats, including Rep. Daniel K. Inouye, were ready to lodge an objection if the GOP slate was counted, but the presiding officer — the Senate president, who also is the vice president: i.e., Nixon — pushed the issue aside. “He resolved it in a rather statesmanlike way by using parliamentary procedure,” State University of New York professor James A. Gardner said in a recent webinar organized by the New York State Bar Association. “He asked for unanimous consent that the votes of the Democratic electors would count. So he resolved this against himself.” …
One has nothing to do with the other, but no I do not support allowing any new states in right now. We need to get the country in order first. In the case of D.C., there would never be an instance where it should be a state even if it were conservative leaning.