Pat Buchanan: End the Wars, Mind our Own Business.

Sammy calls someone a filthy zionist so he is called a filthy arab. It is like calling someone a filthy caucasian. It is not a racist epithet. It is a personal pronoun idiot.

Here is you calling Rep. Allen West a n****r and insulting Malcom-X:

http://www.elitetrader.com/vb/showt...threadid=235634

*That* is a racist epithet.

You are a racist and a cheese-sucking wheezebag.

Idiots on Ignore:
Brass
futurecurrents
walter4
Hasparahte
Mvector
denner
Free Thinker
RCG Trader
budcampbell

If mods will let you paste the same thing over and over it is possible that they will let me paste the same thing over and over.

 

I never called West a n****r and I never,and would never insult Malcom X as he is a hero of mine

Still waiting for that quote or screen shot of me calling west the n word or the time in the video when the n word was used

Can you also quote me insulting Malcom X because I never did that either.Thanks

 

I thought that I'd never see the day that Ak47 is mopping the floor with 377OHMS. It's pretty hard to sit there and call everyone a racist and anti-semite when you've got a dozen examples of your own blatant racism.

 

My posts were direct quotes of your repeated racist and derogatory posts against Arab people,you cant post 1 quote of me calling someone the n word

 

Quoted since 377 claims to have you on ignore

 

Nonsense.

You called Rep. Allen West a n****r in this thread:

http://www.elitetrader.com/vb/showt...threadid=235634

It is indisputable. If denner wants to behave like a cunt as well it doesn't trouble me as he is occupying a permanent place on my ignore list with the rest of the twats.

You are a racist and you are both imbeciles.

 

Quote me or post a screen shot of me calling Rep. Allen West a n****r,thanks

 

Just calling it as I see it. Since you now spend 90% of your time calling everybody racist or an anti-semite, it's imperative that you behave accordingly (political correctness dictates this). Posting denigrating remarks about Arabs makes you a complete hypocrite.

It's best to keep me on ignore so you can live in your own delusional world.

 

Well the Ford dealer has called. Seems we've got an agreement in principle. I'm off to the city to possibly pick up my new toy.

I'll contribute further to this thread when I return. Have a great day, I know I will LOL.

 

I find Pat Buchanan to have been correct the last few years so I have trouble believing he is an anti semite.

I looked it up and found this...

"On American Jews and the Pro-Israel Lobby

2010: “If [Elena] Kagan [President Obama’s nominee to the Supreme Court] is confirmed, Jews, who represent less than 2 percent of the U.S. population, will have 33 percent of the Supreme Court seats. Is this Democrats’ idea of diversity?”

-- Column, “Are Liberals Anti-WASP?” May 14, 2010
2008: “Israel and its Fifth Column in this city seek to stampede us into war with Iran. Bush should rebuff them, and the American people should tell their congressmen: You vote for 362, we don’t vote for you.”

-- Column, “A Phony Crisis — and a Real One,” July 15, 2008
2007: “If you want to know ethnicity and power in the United States Senate, 13 members of the Senate are Jewish folks who are from 2 percent of the population. That is where real power is at….”

-- On The McLaughlin Group, February 2, 2007
2005: “Neocons say we attack them because they are Jewish. We do not. We attack them because their warmongering threatens our country, even as it finds a reliable echo in Ariel Sharon.”

-- Neo-Conned! Just War Principles: A Condemnation of War in Iraq, P.136
2005: “They charge us with anti-Semitism…The truth is, those hurling these charges harbor a 'passionate attachment' to a nation not our own that causes them to subordinate the interests of their own country and to act on an assumption that, somehow, what's good for Israel is good for America.”

-- Neo-Conned! Just War Principles: A Condemnation of War in Iraq, P.137
2005: “Who would benefit from a war of civilizations between the West and Islam? Answer: one nation, one leader, one party. Israel, Sharon, Likud.”

-- Neo-Conned! Just War Principles: A Condemnation of War in Iraq, P.142
2004: "[Richard] Perle's depiction of his delight at first meeting the future president reads like Fagin relating his initial encounter with the young Oliver Twist."

-- Where the Right Went Wrong: How Neoconservatives Subverted the Reagan Revolution and Hijacked the Bush Presidency, P.42
2004: "Who would benefit from these endless wars in a region that holds nothing vital to America-save oil…Who would benefit from a 'war of civilizations' with Islam? Who other than these neoconservatives and Ariel Sharon? Indeed, Sharon was everywhere the echo of his American auxiliary…."

-- Where the Right Went Wrong: How Neoconservatives Subverted the Reagan Revolution and Hijacked the Bush Presidency, P.52
2004: "Israel is in an existential crisis. It can wall itself off and annex what it wants on the West Bank, and leave Palestinians in tiny truncated, nonviable bantustans that will become the spawning pools of terror. Or it can give the Palestinians what Oslo, Camp David, Taba and the 'roadmap' promised; a homeland, a nation and a state of their own. Israel is free to choose. But American needs a Middle East policy made in the USA, not in Tel Aviv, or at AIPAC or AEI."

-- Where the Right Went Wrong: How Neoconservatives Subverted the Reagan Revolution and Hijacked the Bush Presidency, P.241
2004: "America has given up its role as 'honest broker.' President Bush no longer sits at the head of the negotiating table, but directly behind Sharon."

-- Where the Right Went Wrong: How Neoconservatives Subverted the Reagan Revolution and Hijacked the Bush Presidency, P.242
2004: "Dissent to the neocon line on Iraq or Israel has come to be equated with treason."

-- Where the Right Went Wrong: How Neoconservatives Subverted the Reagan Revolution and Hijacked the Bush Presidency, P.248
2004: BUCHANAN: [N]eoconservatives…Perle and Wolfowitz and Wurmser and the others, working with Netanyahu, had an agenda for war with Iraq that was going nowhere.

9/11 happens, and they put this agenda before a president, who in my judgment was untutored, as his father was not. Reagan would not have done this. I don't think his father would have done this.

They captured Rumsfeld, and they captured Cheney, and I think they captured the president…

BLITZER: Did you think of the Jewish line of Fagan [sic] when you wrote that and Richard Perle being Jewish?

BUCHANAN: Well, I mean, obviously Fagan was Jewish. But the thing about it is he was a leader of pick-pockets in a fictional book. Why is it unacceptable for me to use a literary allusion when I am called routinely Father Charles Coughlin of the modern era who was alleged to be an anti-Semitic priest? That is an outrage because that's a real character.

But I'll tell you this. Look, my views with regard to the security of this country - I disagree with Sharon's agenda. I think we have outsourced Middle East policy to Ariel Sharon. I think that's a disaster for this country. It's damaging our relations over the world.

And we cannot allow ourselves to be silenced because people call us names. My objection to the neoconservatives is not their ethnicity, Wolf. It is their war-mongering."

and more...

http://www.adl.org/special_reports/buchanan_own_words/buchanan_intro.asp

It is clearly anti neo con. I do not see it as anti semitic.

You can dislike Euro policy without being anti European. I seem him dislike or detesting policy and maybe even some of the people who were making it. I do not see anti semitism. But, I can see why you might say it is a close call.