All the CT's are barking up the wrong tree. Here's a real conspiracy for all you nuts to chew on: http://www.boston.com/news/nation/a...tied_to_saudi_government_graham_says_in_book/ "Two of the Sept. 11, 2001, hijackers had a support network in the United States that included agents of the Saudi government, and the Bush administration and FBI blocked a congressional investigation into that relationship, Senator Bob Graham wrote in a book to be released Tuesday." "Graham also disclosed that General Tommy Franks told him on Feb. 19, 2002, four months after the invasion of Afghanistan, that many important resources -- including the Predator drone aircraft crucial to the search for Osama bin Laden and Al Qaeda leaders -- were being shifted to prepare for a war against Iraq."
Here's what doesn't pass the smell test: 1. We all saw those buildings being demolished in real-time. We all saw them being imploded. Yet we are told that they were not imploded, rather some jet fuel caused them to free-fall on cue. The 1st and only steel building to ever do so, including WTC 7. 2. We are asked to believe that a passport survived being in a ball of fire. 3. We are asked to believe that a mere few days later, all names and IDs of dead people are magicically known, and that we must now invade and occupy a country (again). 4. We are asked to believe that an oil company CEO is fit to lead a country and by coincidence invades an oil-rich county, and his old company gets all the profitable contracts and defrauds taxpayers by overcharging. 5. We are asked to believe even though no one claimed responsbility for the attack, and ONLY bush mentions it in EVERY speech, that we have nothing to gain from it. That the US despite spending 1/2 its tax $ on military, is a perpetual weak victim. Ditto for Israel - has its own nukes, compulsary miltary service, occupies and oppresses a nation, but somehow remains always the 'victim'. 6. We are asked to believe that there is a massive conspiracy between every country with darkskinned people, who hate the fact that your granny goes to church on sunday. Why don't "they" hate Iceland, or Nambia? Here's an idea - get the f__k out of their country and there will be NO problems. What a novel idea. 7. We are asked to believe that it is a coincidence that newamericancentury.org hoped for a "pearl harbor" type event to allow it to occupy and dominate the vast resources of the middle east. Wish came true. All conincidence of course.
And then...we have the widely reported story of Isreali messaging firm Odigo receiving advance warning, in their WTC office. GEE, what are the chances that Israel is behind (another) false flag terror event designed to demonize their hated Arabs, and to allow the "chosen ones" to continue to commit genocide against them. Naw, the nice friendly mossad would never do that! They are too busy ":spreading democracy". Read your history books folks. This is not the first false flag terror event by israel. Google: kind david hotel, and the attack on the USS Liberty. This is a wet dream come true for them. And google search Dancing Isralies: http://www.google.ca/search?hl=en&q=dancing+israelis&meta= MOTIVE MOTIVE MOTIVE - WHO is gaining from the US invading and killind arabs? Why, Isreal who has sworn to destory arabs and raises its kids to hate them. Just the truth folks.
Thank god the 9/11 "surprise" attack occured for Israel, eh? Then we invaded: You guys getting the picture yet of who is CLEARLY benefiting from this? You feel good about sending your kids to die in war for them, and to give them billions of your tax dollars each and every year (FACT)? Do you really have a choice, you do live in a "democracy", right? Rabbi calls for annihilation of Arabs Tuesday, 10 April, 2001, The spiritual leader of Israel's ultra-orthodox Shas party, Rabbi Ovadia Yosef, has provoked outrage with a sermon calling for the annihilation of Arabs. "It is forbidden to be merciful to them. You must send missiles to them and annihilate them. They are evil and damnable," he was quoted as saying in a sermon delivered on Monday to mark the Jewish festival of Passover. http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/middle_east/1270038.stm
Forgot to mention, then the owner of WTC - Larry Silverstien no longer has the problem of removing asbestos from them, and then tried to colect 2 insurance payments (arguing that it was 2 events). Pure coincidence I guess! Everywhere you look, Israel's fingerprints are all over this. Their members also run the private Federal Reserve who owns us.
Brezinski Suggests False Flag Event Could Kick-Start Iran War Top globalist warns Congress of provocation or terrorist attack inside U.S. Paul Joseph Watson Prison Planet Tuesday, February 6, 2007 Former National Security Advisor and founding member of the Trilateral Commission Zbigniew Brzezinski tacitly warned a Senate Foreign Relations Committee last week that an attack on Iran could be launched following a staged provocation in Iraq or a false flag terror attack within the U.S. Brzezinski alluded to the potential for the Bush administration to manufacture a false flag Gulf of Tonkin type incident in describing a "plausible scenario for a military collision with Iran," which would revolve around "some provocation in Iraq or a terrorist act in the US blamed on Iran, culminating in a âdefensiveâ US military action against Iran that plunges a lonely America into a spreading and deepening quagmire eventually ranging across Iraq, Iran, Afghanistan and Pakistan.â Brzezinski was careful to highlight the word "defensive" as if to discount its credibility, suggesting that the Bush White House itself would be behind the attack or provocation and subsequently use it as a pretext for war. "That a man such as Brzezinski, with decades of experience in the top echelons of the US foreign policy establishment, a man who has the closest links to the military and to intelligence agencies, should issue such a warning at an open hearing of the US Senate has immense and grave significance," argues WSWS.org. After Senators asked Brzezinski for clarification of exactly what he meant, the Polish-American political scientist referenced the infamous White House memo in which Bush and Blair discussed staging a provocation for an invasion of Iraq following the absence of weapons of mass destruction. Brzezinski cited how Bush "described the several ways in which this could be done," but refused to elaborate, stating only, "the ways were quite sensational, at least one of them." Brzezinski is of course referring to the plan to fly a U2 spy plane painted with UN colors over Iraq and goading Saddam to order the aircraft shot down, resulting in widespread international support for the war. Bush and Blair openly discussed the possibility of staging this provocation along with others during their January 31 2003 meeting. "If one is of the view that one is dealing with an implacable enemy that has to be removed, that course of action may under certain circumstances be appealing. Iâm afraid that if this situation in Iraq continues to deteriorate, and if Iran is perceived as in some fashion involved or responsible, or a potential beneficiary, that temptation could arise," said Brzezinski. Former National Security Adviser Zbigniew Brzezinski arrives to testify before the Senate Foreign Relations Committee on Capitol Hill in Washington, February 1, 2007. REUTERS/Jim Young (UNITED STATES) After his testimony, journalist Barry Grey tried to pin down Brzezinski and get specifics on the warning, asking, "Are you suggesting there is a possibility it could originate within the US government itself?" "Iâm saying the whole situation can get out of hand and all sorts of calculations can produce a circumstance that would be very difficult to trace," responded Brzezinski. Should an attack occur within the U.S. as Brzezinski forecasted could happen, Dick Cheney's USSTRATCOM contingency plan calls for attacking Iran in the immediate aftermath of a 'second 9/11' - no matter who is behind it - which of course is going to be the cabal Dick Cheney fronts for itself and the same pack of murderers that are actively seeking to initiate global ethic cleansing and genocide to bring about world war three. During his testimony, Brzezinski lamented that the invasion of Iraq represented "a historic, strategic and moral calamity." Brzezinski's words and his desire to see the exercse of a "moral" foreign policy ring hollow, especially when it is understood that it was the former National Security Advisor to Carter himself who was responsible for drawing up the plan to arm and train the Islamic fundamentalist mujahideen at the end of the 70's and groom Osama bin Laden as a client of the U.S. In addition, in his 1997 book The Grand Chessboard: American Primacy and Its Geo-strategic Imperatives, Brzezinski calls for the U.S. to install itself as the world's only superpower by taking over the Middle East and using it as a lever to control what he terms the Eurasian Balkans. Similar to the PNAC yearning for a "new Pearl Harbor," Brzezinski concludes that the realization of such an agenda will only be accomplished with the aid of "a truly massive and widely perceived direct external threat," which was helpfully provided by the events of 9/11. So for Brzezinski to win plaudits for being critical of what's happening in Iraq is not only the height of hypocrisy, it's a myopic leap of logic that omits the past history of Brzezinski's rampant warmongering. Whatever the reason for Brzezinski's apparent sudden change of heart, be it a pang or consciousness of simple political maneuvering, judging from his previous writings one feels it's more appropriate to take his reference to a false flag attack as a threat rather than a warning. http://www.prisonplanet.com/articles/february2007/060207falseflag.htm
Like they say, tell a big enough lie and people might just believe it. Israel has never 'sworn to destroy' arabs. You must be thinking of radical Muslims, who have publicly and repeatedly sworn to destroy all Jews and Israel. It's ok if you made this mistake; you seem to be confused much of the time. If there's any question about the bloodthirstiness of radical Muslims, all one needs to do is look at the amount of Muslim-on-Muslim butchery. Every day we hear about Sunnis murdering Shia and vice versa. The death rates have recently spiked to hundreds every day, tens of thousand over the past few decades. What's that? The reason Muslims are murdering each other is because of the American occupation of Iraq? Really? Why? I have been vocal about my feeling that the American efforts in Iraq have been misguided, especially in the past 36 months, but I fail to see how their presence makes Muslims butcher each other. Hmm... let's see. Do we ever here about Israelis butchering each other by the thousands? Do we hear anything about Jews anywhere butchering each other like the radical Muslims do? The answer to that would be no. The question is, why do the Radical Muslims feel the need to murder each other and others? The answer seems to be that they think they have a God-given mandate to murder what they call 'infidels'. The infidels can apparently be other Muslims as well as normal people like me, who aren't Muslim and who reject the violence and bloodlust of radical Islam. Radical Muslims have said they want to destroy a number of other peoples, not only Jews. Moderate Muslims, who I still believe represent the majority, must be sickened by the bloodlust and criminal acts of their brethren. I am sure that they just want to be left alone to live their life and practice their religion without threatening to behead anyone who doesn't agree with them, which the perpetrators of 9/11 love to do.
Here's a synopsis, which shows how gutless TorontoTrader actually is. Why don't you man up and start a thread called 'let's exterminate the Jews'. That would be more on point than all this conspiracy crap you're hiding behind. ok...
When I first listened to a 9/11 conspiracy theorist I gave their arguments some good thought and went home and spent about 8 hours researching the whole issue. In a nutshell, there is a mountain, MOUNTAIN, of evidence that 9/11 occured the way it was reported and slivers of slivers of confusing leads pointing the other way. All conspiracy theories are this way-- ignore the volumes and volumes of data in favor of little, shadey, grey areas. I have given up on arguing with these people. I put in my time doing research and formulating an educated argument only to run into walls and walls of morons that watch that stupid movie on YouTube and act like they just found the holy grail. Again, arguing with conspiracy theorists will get you no where. They are set in their beliefs and even if you taught them basic physics and structural science and showed them how everything lines up fine...they would still argue that it was the Jews or Bush or some bs. Dont waste your time. We have other more pressing matters to worry about-- like, oh I dunno, the war in Iraq.