Palin Hit With Another Ethics Complaint

Discussion in 'Politics' started by OPTIONAL777, Jul 7, 2009.

  1. In the wake of Governor Palin stepping down from her job, new allegations have surfaced today in Alaska charging Palin with additional violations of the Alaska Executive Ethics Act.

    Zane Henning -- a conservative government watchdog from the governor's hometown of Wasilla and an oilfield worker on Alaska's North Slope -- asserts in a letter to Alaska Attorney General Daniel S. Sullivan that Palin has "been charging and pocketing per diem to live in her home and has used the process for a personal gain since being elected."

    The Washington Post first broke this story last September during the 2008 presidential race, but until now, no formal ethics charges have been brought on the matter in Alaska.

    In a detailed press release accompanying his complaint, Henning declared that:

    Palin's use of the per diem is in direct conflict with Section 39.52.120. (a) of the Alaska Executive Ethics Act....More than a thousand state employees commute from the Mat-Su Valley daily and none of them get to pocket free money.

    Henning noted that "the State of Alaska provides housing in Juneau for the Governor."

    If she chooses not to live there, Alaskans should not have to pay for it. I am requesting that you and the Personnel Board direct Governor Sarah Palin to reimburse the State of Alaska all per diem funds, plus interest, and a fine that are related to charges while staying in her Wasilla residence.

    Henning further argued that Alaska Statute 39.20.010 sets an "annual salary for the governor of $125,000."

    Sarah Palin has collected more than the amount established by law by cashing in her per diem checks. Alaska Statute 39.20.050 (Exclusive Compensation) states that the compensation fixed by law for the governor and lieutenant governor is in full for all services rendered by each of them in any official capacity or employment whatsoever during their respective terms of office. Per diem is therefore any added expenses incurred while in travel status, not when living in your own home.

    According to Henning:

    State travel regulations say that per diem can't be claimed when travel is less than 50 miles from a state employee's workplace. The IRS and state finance officer have already determined that the per diem is considered income. The governor's workplace in Anchorage is only a 45-mile commute from her Wasilla home.

    In February, Palin was required to pay back income taxes on thousands of dollars in expense money she received while living at her home overlooking Lake Lucille in Wasilla. Little more than two weeks ago she was forced to pay back the State of Alaska more than $8,100.00 for nine trips taken by her children that she had improperly charged as being part of official state business.

    Henning contends the per diem is another way for the Alaska governor to line her pockets at the state's expense:

    As a Wasilla resident I know that thousands of valley residents commute into Anchorage for work every day. They don't receive checks from their employers for sleeping at home. Governor Palin does. And it's wrong, not to mention unethical, for her to even submit these per diem claims. To me, this is a roundabout way for Palin to give herself a raise.

    "The Governor is quitting her job," said Henning, "and now more than ever the State of Alaska, along with its residents, need to be reimbursed for the per diem charges, including interest and a fine...t is up to private citizens, like myself, to hold our Governor accountable."
  2. Hey! Lets also subtract her pay for the time she spends sleeping every night! Thats an ethics violation too! They pay 125k per year for her salary and alaskans shouldnt have to pay for the time she spends sleeping (8 hours every night if you can believe that!)....I mean...other alaskans dont get paid to sleep!
  3. how did you miss this one since ethics complaints seem to be so important?

    What's more bizarre about the story is the person in charge of ethics investigations for all these democrats named also has to investigate himself.

    CBC member vows fair probe of Caribbean trip
    By Susan Crabtree
    Posted: 07/06/09 08:05 PM [ET]
    The chairman of a House ethics probe into a Caribbean conference attended by members of the Congressional Black Caucus is himself a CBC member who attended the same event in 2005.

    Rep. G.K. Butterfield (D-N.C.), the former judge chosen to chair the ethics probe, has vowed to lead a fair investigation into trips taken by CBC members to St. Maarten in 2008 and Antigua and Barbuda in 2007.

    But the ethics watchdogs that have called for an investigation into whether corporations paid for the trips, which would violate House ethics rules, question whether a CBC member should be leading the official probe set up by the House ethics panel.

    They also argue that it is improper for someone who attended the Caribbean conference to lead an investigation into whether it violated House rules.

    “There is certainly an appearance problem — an appearance problem that in no way reflects on the integrity of Mr. Butterfield,” said Meredith McGehee of the Campaign Legal Center.

    McGehee and other ethics experts argue that Butterfield’s 2005 trip is a conflict of interest because of relationships he may have developed with conference organizers and sponsors. Butterfield’s trip occurred before Democrats imposed new House rules on such trips.

    Butterfield said he realized “you cannot completely divorce yourself from relationships.” He also said he would step down or recuse himself if he felt conflicted at any time during the investigation.

    “I have a judicial background and always had the reputation of being fair — never had any criticism or complaints,” Butterfield said in a brief interview. “I’m confident that I can uphold the House rules and ensure that the investigation is even-handed.”

    In a separate e-mail, Butterfield added that the investigation focuses on issues specifically related to compliance with the new House rules, which were implemented in 2007. He said his participation in the Caribbean multinational business conference in 2005 had no impact on his ability to lead the investigation.

    Articles in The Hill and the New York Post have raised questions about the conferences, which listed the New York Carib News Foundation as the sole sponsor even though corporations underwrote all or parts of their costs. The foundation is a nonprofit group affiliated with a newspaper aimed at New York City’s Caribbean immigrant community.

    House rules imposed by Democrats after they took back the majority in 2006 bar lawmakers from accepting travel lasting more than two days if corporations that “employ or retain a registered lobbyist” are underwriting or organizing any part of the trip.

    Photos taken at the 2008 conference show banners bearing several corporate logos, including Pfizer, AT&T, Verizon, American Airlines and Citigroup. Against the backdrop of corporate logos, two CBC members thanked the corporate sponsors by name, according to recordings made of conference sessions.

    Members attending the 2008 conference include Ways and Means Committee Chairman Charles Rangel (D-N.Y.), Reps. Carolyn Kilpatrick (D-Mich.), Sheila Jackson Lee (D-Texas), Donald Payne (D-N.J.) and Bennie Thompson (D-Miss.) and Virgin Islands Del. Donna Christensen (D).

    Rangel, his chief of staff George Dalley and Christensen, Thompson, Rep. Yvette Clarke (D-N.Y.) and the late Rep. Stephanie Tubbs Jones (D-Ohio), who chaired the ethics panel at the time, participated in the 2007 trip to Antigua and Barbuda.

    The Office of Congressional Ethics (OCE), set up by House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) to better police ethics issues, first reviewed the Caribbean travel and apparently found enough evidence to recommend further inquiry by the ethics committee. The OCE has come under criticism from the CBC, which has complained about a lack of minorities in the office.

    In 2005, Butterfield attended the same Caribbean conference his panel is now investigating — before House rules were changed. The conference was held at St. Thomas’s oceanfront Wyndham Sugar Bay Resort and Spa on Nov. 10-13 of that year.

    “That trip was privately funded and approved by ethics,” Butterfield said in the e-mail.

    Butterfield listed the New York Carib News as the sole sponsor of the event, even though corporations underwrote some of the costs.

    On the travel disclosure forms, Butterfield lists the costs of the trip at $995. He said $695 of that was spent on lodging and $300 on a flight. He lists no costs for meals during the three-day stay.

    It is unclear how much the resort charged for conference lodging because rates change from year to year and are lower than individual rates depending on the size of the conference and how many rooms are blocked. According to the hotel’s website, rates for November 2009 are $259 a night for a resort-view room, $293 for a bay view and $342 for a panoramic ocean view.

    Peter Flaherty, the president of a conservative watchdog group that uncovered evidence of the trip’s corporate sponsors, said he was disappointed with Butterfield’s appointment.

    “The CBC really sticks together — you can see their solidarity in the face of these ethics charges,” Flaherty said. “To put one of their own members in charge of the investigation just shows that nothing has changed — the ethics process is still a complete mockery.”

    McGehee also questioned whether a CBC member should be leading the probe.

    “In this case, this is a trip that is publicly connected to the CBC — and only CBC members were participants. To have a CBC member lead the investigation is not the best way to ensure a publicly credible and accepted result,” McGehee said.
  4. ex-governor ... dickheads

    can you idiots now get over your obsession with an irrelevant politician.

    the moderate left and the wack-job left seem equally disappointed in their wack-job messiah, viciously attacking a governor of a state 3000 miles away from no where was their 'happy place'

    no more idiots ... now Palin talk sounds no more intelligent then gossiping about brittany spears, (as if it ever did)