Pair Trading Strategy Journal

Discussion in 'Journals' started by jonnysharp, Aug 18, 2008.

  1. New trades

    Long CVO @ 2.44
    Short NP @ 5.13

    Long ACE @ 33.95
    Short ACGL @ 51.34
     
    #621     Mar 3, 2009
  2. Does anyone have extensive experience with pair trading the ETF indicies (i.e. SPY vs. DIA)? This seems much "safer" than pair trading stocks. No merger/acquisition fears; No earnings suprise; no major news to impact it the way a stock would be impacted; etc...

    Of course, the major downside is the small divergence and convergence moves during most days. However, a major consideration is that the convergence between these two pairs has moved about 10 points in the last 7 months. There seems to be a direct correlation between convergence/divergence and the direction of the market. On a daily or short-term basis, I believe that the layering strategy can work pretty well.

    Any thoughts....

    Walt
     
    #622     Mar 3, 2009
  3. If you want something really safe play IVV:SPY, IAU:GLD.
    Just kiding, it's all automated.
    The more obvious something is, the more people are looking at it and there is therefore less and less opportunities.
    To make money in DIA:SPY you need to take more risk (bigger size) per trade because the expected yield is smaller.
    You must look for dividend and also rebalancement in the ETF. I have no clue how to get that info.
    So, to me, it's a pair like any other one. Maybe there is some risks that disapear but it's all balanced by the lower expeted yield.
    The way I see it it's better to spread your risk over many small trades and a good analysis of the potential risks.
    I guess it could be a good candidate for yobo method #3.
    Good luck.
     
    #623     Mar 3, 2009
  4. yobo

    yobo

    Yes indeed. ETFs are a great way to pair trade using method number three since they tend to trend very well. Excellent swing trades. Here's a pair that just triggered in my system Long SPY short KRE. 50 day moving average just crossed under the 200 day moving average a few days ago. Pair ratio trend is lower from here.
     
    #624     Mar 4, 2009
  5. In my experience, you want to embrace the risk of stock vs. stock pairs instead of ETF's because you get much more oppurtunity, especially when using a layering strategy. I am referring to mean reverting pairs. Too much correlation is not good, just like too little is not good. Change the strategy, like trend following then too little is a good thing. Also look treat every relationship differently, each pair has a personality and needs to be treated as such. I think it is a common misconception among beginning pairs traders and I struggled with it for a long time.
     
    #625     Mar 4, 2009
  6. Jonny,

    What are you finding are your typical holding times right now?

    I did 8% total net return in 2 months which I felt was pretty good. For the first 1-1/2 months the trades were very short and showing good profit. Usually only green on one side. Some pairs were held only a day. I have been taking profits whether the pair gives an exit signal or not if I get a decent percentage spike.

    The last couple of weeks the pairs have been moving lock step and not generating profit in the same manner. I was wondering if you are seeing the same thing? Might just be the very directional moves of the market?

    Thanks,

    Lazy
     
    #626     Mar 4, 2009
  7. ascheer7

    ascheer7

    Johnnysharp....First let me thank you for this pairtrading journal. Have you updated your results since posting them on page 71 of this journal? If not, could you perhaps post them here for us?
     
    #627     Mar 4, 2009
  8. good advice here.
     
    #628     Mar 4, 2009
  9. Yes we are currently in a soft patch with pair trading, there is a bit of dislocation in the market and spreads are widening and holding, feels similar to early october, back then proved a good time to place spreads, with a decent bounce in the market I expect a lot of pairs to snap back quickly, even overnight.
     
    #629     Mar 4, 2009
  10. No not yet, Il get around to it soon enough. Il do them every quarter for assessment any shorter time period is irrelevant.
     
    #630     Mar 5, 2009