Why the hell would someone post porn on a trading site? Plenty of great sites for that. Stop saying you are Libertarian. You are not. Allowing one person to kill another for convenience is not libertarian. I would look at some of your old posts to find other examples of the fraud you are, but its not really worth the time. I believe in protection of the individual, you don't.
I see others posting images of people in blackface and images of the KKK which is very offensive from what I am told. It is almost as if some people are completely full of shit. It is sort of like the pot calling the kettle black (no pun intended).
I will allow the moderators decide what is over the line. With the clear warning that graphic images of aborted fetuses is considered over the line in nearly 100% of Internet websites while news stories with images of blackface politicians is not.
First of all, please show the evidence that it is considered over the line on nearly 100% of the Internet websites. I somehow found images of it and lets see, I found them on a fringe site called Google. Lets see how big is Google? Ohhh its the top site in the world. Not to worry, if I wanted to find videos of it I could go to a fringe video site called, Youtube. Ohhh, its the number two site in the world. I looked at the number 3 site in the world, Facebook, and guess what, more images. The number 4 website is Baidu and there are images of it there. So it would appear that you want even more censorship than exists in Red China. Speak factually, or don't speak.
GOP says abortions are fine in cases of incest or rape....so I guess not all babies are created equal then.
You do realize that Google and Baidu are just search websites that link you to other locations, eh? Feel free to post all the graphic abortion images you want. I will start a side betting pool on how long it takes for the moderators to take them down and eventually apply a ban.
"Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances." This is what the founding fathers said. I will take the founding fathers over some moderators on the internet anyday. BTW, you were supposed to provide evidence that nearly 100% of internet websites banned such images. Please provide some proof. Lastly, no you are incorrect about your statement about Google. I can view shitloads of images without ever leaving the Google website. Simply search "images of abortion" press search, then click images. You can get 1000s of images without ever leaving Google.com. You see, I am a literalist. If you want something to be legal, you come and show me what you want legal, then I make a decision. I want to know literally what happens.