Our Constitution Is Under Attack

For much of its 236-year history, the federal government has accumulated new power by whittling away at the essential protections afforded to American citizens under the U.S. Constitution.

In recent years this wholesale abandonment of our founding principles has rapidly gained momentum — accompanied by a skyrocketing government debt that now eclipses our nation's annual gross domestic product.

"There's a clear cause and effect here that is as neat and predictable as a law of physics," President Reagan said in his farewell address to the nation in 1989. "As government expands, liberty contracts."

No truer words have ever been spoken — yet in the last half-decade this nation has witnessed a stunning (and astronomically expensive) escalation of neo-fascism in America.

And no political party, court nor ideological movement has proved able to blunt its building momentum.

During the debate over ObamaCare — a massive, budget-busting entitlement funded with money our country doesn't have — former New Jersey Judge Andrew Napolitano pointedly challenged then-U.S. Majority Whip Jim Clyburn, D-S.C., regarding the constitutionality of this socialized medicine monstrosity.

Clyburn's response?

"There's nothing in the Constitution that says the federal government has anything to do with most of the stuff we do," he said.

Therein lies the root of our problem.

The overt contempt for our Constitution displayed by Clyburn and other elected officials is precisely why government has become so unruly, so fiscally unsustainable and so dangerous.

Tragically for our Republic, the U.S. Supreme Court empowered this view in its ObamaCare ruling — inventing a new taxing authority to accommodate this abomination rather than following the law and protecting our liberties.

Decades of legislative overreach, executive power grabs and judicial activism have steadily diminished our freedom and free markets — a disintegration that may have already reached the point of terminal velocity.

Our national government now prints unlimited piles of money with no congressional oversight.

It taps our phones and emails with no probable cause. It compels us to purchase products or face stiff fines. And now it wants to strip us of our right to keep and bear arms.

Yet even these egregious incursions are not enough for some members of the professional left.

In a recent column published by the New York Times, Georgetown University law professor Louis Michael Seidman argues for the wholesale abandonment of the U.S. Constitution, decrying "all its archaic, idiosyncratic and downright evil provisions."

"We have to give up on the claim that we are a self-governing people who can settle our disagreements through mature and tolerant debate," Seidman writes. "We ought to try extricating ourselves from constitutional bondage so that we can give real freedom a chance."

"Real freedom"? From "constitutional bondage"?

These assertions are demonstrably illogical.

Arguing one's freedom would improve by allowing government to tighten its grip is like arguing one's breathing would improve by allowing an anaconda to do the same.

Yet we are supposed to accept the ongoing suffocation of our freedom and free markets in the name of expediting a socialist agenda that is bankrupting our country?

And give up more of our money — and our guns — to the new overlords?

Like so many ivory-tower leftists whose anti-American views hold sway in Washington, Seidman sees the Constitution as something to be shaken off — like a bad cold.

Of course, what he fails to recognize is that his prescription for constitutional emasculation would kill the very source of the federal government's power and legitimacy.

Absent the Constitution, there is no government — only anarchy.

One cannot destroy our founding document without destroying the nation it created (or what's left of it).

And make no mistake — once freed from any real or implied constraint, government becomes the tyranny our Founding Fathers (and most present-day Americans) fear.

In other words, it ceases to be America.

http://news.investors.com/ibd-edito...dom-depends-on-strong-constitution.htm?p=full

 

Yes, it is. It was also under attack under GW. And Clinton. And Bush Sr. And Reagan etc. Under Obama, it has gone parabolic.

 

pspr has to be a crack head!

It's OK for scum like him to disregard the constitutional edict against separation of church and state but blow smoke out his arse when the 2nd amendment supposedly, allegedly is "under attack" by seeeking to banning some weapons! Nothing in the Constitution is absolute or subject to only ONE interpretation.

I am an attorney and former prosecutor. I know the Constitution, for real. [what the f-ck am I dong on a website with so many amateur, charlatan legal scholars? - LOL]

Arse-holes like pspr and others from the right-wing hypocritical ilk - DO NOT!

LOL

 

I remember watching that on video and my recollection is it was said far before the obamacare issue. I believe it was at a townhall in which all the BS unconstitutional bailout and stimulus plans were questioned.

I also distinctly remember democrats cancelling all townhall formats where the audience was NOT PRESCREENED AND SELECTED. This was before the 2010 midterm rout.

 

Pelosi was asked where in the Constitution it allows Congress to create ObamaCare and her response was, 'Are you kidding? Are you kidding?"

 

1)WTF are you talking about?

2) No you are just a liberal dickhead nothing more .

3) Obviously you're on here because you like getting your ass kicked.
My advise is go be a constitutional scholar somewhere else.

4) Myself I have to question the veracity of everything coming outta the sewers of academia today that is not directly from the School of hard science's anything else is highly likely to have an agenda and be complete BS including "constitutional scholarship".

 

Too bad you don't have a degree in morality you piece of sh*t. You're the type of scumbag that would have no problem harming others as long as it was legal to do so. Go suck your master's cock some more.

 

Well said. Agree on all counts.

 

What a steaming pile of shit.

 

Pretty amazing stuff , as far as I'm concerned she deserved summary execution for treason on the spot.

Lets just be honest and admit the Constitution has been a piece of shit paper ever since 1860 and the founding father's experiment failed.