it is your problem that you are not able to understand that, you were deliberately taken away into various dubious mathematical calculations, so as not to give the opportunity to link the disparate into a single whole it's your problem that you succumb easily to neuro-linguistic programming
Before the advent of computers, there was no need to distract people from the real question, it is unlikely that someone began to double-check everything using graph paper, a slide rule and a triangle, but with the advent of a computer this became a real problem, and all efforts were aimed at distracting attention traders - dubious math
Hardly. You know nothing of my methods. Nor do you have any expertise outside of naming market technicians of the past, and applying your chosen triangles and averages. Stick to what you know.
I use mathematics, where there are no variables and averages, only clear mathematical values, which is why my method has no equal, and its efficiency is a million times higher than that of any other method That is why any professor is immediately silent and trying to understand how I did it.
it is this knowledge, time — volatility, and such nuances that allowed me to change the initial forecast #17 Nov 3, 2019 #85 Nov 5, 2019 and easily take all the profit from a downtrend
And for this knowledge, you need to not only redraw your consciousness, but also look for landmarks for 7-10 years, of which I carry out my calculations
The question remains, Grover Cleveland fan, who was president before the stock market actually existed as we know it... What is the price going to do tomorrow, and what have you done lately in real money trades? Post your logs for all of us to see? Because man, nobody is perfect. (P.S. Russia invented U.S. presidents).
Can I ask why don't (some of) you respect and try to listen to him? If there's a system works for someone, it doesn't mean that it's going to work for everyone unless it's mechanical. He's trying to point something. You can chose to believe in him or not but at the end, none of you, including me, are 100% profitable. If we are trying to make money in the market where more than 75% lose, i chose to respect every single idea. There are people claiming they can have 60% win rate with 1:2 R. And they teach that strategy and say "now go ahead and backtest!". Why did i pay you if i am going to backtest it? You should teach me something which was already backtested. All they are doing is trying to earn some time before people start yelling. Also 60% win-rate with 1:2R is almost impossible. I have simulated this and you can find the results attached to this post. I have simulated only 200 trades.
why don't they respect? for example, one person has already heard me and is now trying to figure it out #228 Nov 11, 2019 and that’s good already! He begins to think with his head, and those who think with his ass are not interested in me. Now this person has nothing, but a little time will pass and he will have a database with which he can already work effectively