Oscillators

Discussion in 'Technical Analysis' started by Resto, Nov 2, 2019.

  1. Resto

    Resto

    "current combination
    444 -3
    I know exactly what will be the next sequence

    and therefore in the end we will definitely get - 1 triangle union 8

    This will be my entry point in time.
    know the volatility of the pound and therefore 100% take this volatility

    but most importantly, I know from the sequence of these series when exactly this volatility will be worked out and how long it will take


    question - can this be called an algorithm?

    who do I believe more, some idiot who is talking about trading volumes, averaging
    or what I see with my own eyes and these sequences have not changed for more than 50 years


    This is flat volatility, the trend has the same number series, and the difference is only in volatility, trend volatility is greater than flat volatility

    since the sequence of combining 3 triangles into 1 triangle, I just have to wait for the unifying peak and close the whole deal in profit
    "

    As you can see, the current sequence is not broken, and the pound continues to work in the upward direction. All that remains for a competent trader is to wait for time to enter into a transaction, enter into a transaction and get a guaranteed profit. In this series it will be number 4, and until it is formed, your profit will grow and grow

    and the number 4 can be formed only after the last triangle of this number series is formed


    You are idiots because you cannot pay attention to the price chart, and it contains a huge amount of information that you simply cannot understand



    after the number 4 of the current series is formed, you can make a transaction at least 100 billion, but the price will not go up, it will not pay any attention to the volume of this transaction, it has been like this for more than 50 years and it will always be so


    if in this case even force majeure takes place, then the price will react only after 15 minutes
     
    Last edited: Nov 18, 2019
    #341     Nov 18, 2019
  2. Resto

    Resto

    Well, THIS is another example - time volatility, both indicators worked like you never dreamed
     
    #342     Nov 18, 2019
  3. SunTrader

    SunTrader

    You do know that volume, in forex, is not the only unknown variable, as to what its exact value is?

    Right?
     
    #343     Nov 18, 2019
  4. Resto

    Resto

    And your professional traders can suck on “lollipop” and monitor volumes, listen to news, use oscillators and try to catch 10-15 points for good luck.
    And smart people just trade the algorithm
     
    #344     Nov 18, 2019
  5. Resto

    Resto

    And what do you know in general?
    and what is the difference between forex quotes and stock quotes, And on the stock exchange and forex the same algorithm works
     
    #345     Nov 18, 2019
  6. Resto

    Resto

    Earlier, I showed that Brent’s work is a stock ticker, the action of the stock and the same algorithm always worked perfectly!
     
    #346     Nov 18, 2019
  7. SunTrader

    SunTrader

    Not in general at all. Specifically, that price is not price.

    In almost all cases retail forex brokers data is the current bid. Not price.

    Annnnnd in almost all cases forex brokers bid data is their own customers transactions or maybe grouped with a few other brokers customers transactions.

    There is no central overhead trading exchange/transactional warehousing involved.
     
    #347     Nov 18, 2019
  8. Resto

    Resto

    Man, you seem to have no idea what Forex is.
    and therefore go in the ass
     
    #348     Nov 18, 2019
  9. SunTrader

    SunTrader

    Sorry to burst your bubble.
     
    #349     Nov 18, 2019
  10. Resto

    Resto

    guy you really are a fool, sorry I didn’t tell you this in plain text
     
    #350     Nov 18, 2019