your professional traders are the most stupid people on the planet and all they can do is demagogy and lose money
The cycle-finding method I used in the example is not relevant to your method. I responded to your post because you mentioned an interest in using neural networks. Neural networks can help recognize relationships among different data. The genetic programming software I developed can also help recognize relationships among different data and output human-readable rules like Code: rule 1 XLBror000BarsAhead_00_part02 <- /fitness 0.396508 /numWins 359 /numHits 504 /netWins 214 /mean 5.56781 /perfMeasure 266.494 /winPct 71.2302 /hitPct 9.96638 /numTxns 5057 /numInstr 60 /crc 8ea11c4b2a5c64b 0000: if scaled_close2000to1333 >= scaled_close0833to0611 0001: if -70.222 > scaled_close1500to1138 0002: return 89 0003: if -75.7858 >= scaled_close0888to0555 0004: return 89 0005: if scaled_close0944to0055 <= scaled_close1638to0555 0006: if -56.095 > scaled_close0472to0027 0007: if -54.0955 < scaled_close0833to0194 0008: if -26.1458 > scaled_close1416to1277 0009: if scaled_close0722to0555 > scaled_close0916to0500 0010: return 89 0011: if scaled_close1583to0361 > scaled_close1888to0166 0012: if scaled_close0638to0388 >= -16.0178 0013: if scaled_close1833to1722 <= 0.152138 0014: if scaled_close0666to0500 <= -60.0071 0015: return 89 0016: if scaled_close0861to0416 >= -31.4488 0017: if 61.3981 >= scaled_close1555to0916 0018: if scaled_close1583to0888 >= scaled_close0722to0000 0019: if scaled_close1777to0444 > scaled_close1388to0777 0020: if scaled_close1166to0861 <= scaled_close1333to0138 0021: if scaled_close1944to1638 < -44.663 0022: if scaled_close1666to0833 > scaled_close1777to1694 0023: return 89 0024: if scaled_close1916to1000 <= scaled_close1944to0277 0025: if scaled_close1916to0055 <= -38.5341 0026: if scaled_close1083to0083 > scaled_close0666to0277 0027: if scaled_close0138to0111 < scaled_close0972to0444 0028: return 89 0029: if -62.3978 > scaled_close0861to0805 0030: if scaled_close0083to0027 < 74.5253 0031: if -23.1031 > scaled_close0555to0166 0032: if scaled_close1777to1388 < scaled_close0250to0138 0033: if scaled_close0305to0111 <= 70.3959 0034: if -66.875 <= scaled_close1833to1361 0035: if scaled_close1361to0138 > scaled_close1694to0388 0036: if scaled_close1750to0805 >= -54.5302 0037: return 89 0038: if scaled_close1611to1583 >= -6.80268 0039: if scaled_close1555to0527 <= scaled_close0722to0694 0040: if 37.6212 > scaled_close0972to0388 0041: if -52.5306 < scaled_close0277to0083 0042: if scaled_close0305to0194 < -63.0063 0043: if scaled_close1722to1583 > scaled_close1638to1333 0044: return 89 0045: if scaled_close1444to0916 < scaled_close1750to1333 0046: if scaled_close0611to0250 >= scaled_close1333to1055 0047: if -53.1392 >= scaled_close0500to0388 0048: if 38.0994 < scaled_close1111to0222 0049: if scaled_close2000to1000 < scaled_close1222to0222 0050: return 89 0051: if scaled_close1750to1277 >= -50.8354 0052: if 54.3128 <= scaled_close1194to0888 0053: if scaled_close1250to0055 <= scaled_close1611to0944 0054: if scaled_close1138to0055 < scaled_close1861to1694 0055: if -61.398 < scaled_close0444to0361 0056: if scaled_close1083to1027 >= -50.7485 0057: if scaled_close0888to0722 < 58.051 0058: if scaled_close1916to0027 <= 34.4481 0059: return 89 return NAN So I was offering to help you for free achieve your goal through an alternative to neural networks.
I respected your method, pointed out the shortcomings to which you should pay attention, but I am not ready to share my data with programmers, this data can destroy the established balance in the market and deprive any instrument of liquidity, this will cause an imbalance and the collapse of exchange trading PS I called you a dreamer and not a moron
Your US Securities and Exchange Commission, SEC, examines any major transaction under the microscope, and if this transaction is successful, immediately accuses the trader of using insider information, what will happen to you if you constantly have the ideal entry and exit points? it is this system that monitors whether the algorithm of market pricing is decrypted or not
But the most amazing feature of your professional traders is that these idiots are not able to understand basic things, such as, for example, Buffett, Sorros, rather large investors, but they understand that their transactions are not able to move the price in the right direction, they rely on a chance and invest their money in the future, hoping to profit from their transactions, and your professional idiots are not able to understand this and focus on large volumes in the moment but at the same time they have no idea what volumes are on other exchanges
there are programmers among you and let's get back to this post Thursday at 5:20 AM and so, the time series of constructing triangles in time 345- 554 1 triangle union 10 554=564 1 triangle union 10 564-444 1 triangle union 10 444-544 1 triangle union 11 544-465 1 triangle union 10 465-455 1 triangle union 11 455-334 1 triangle union 6 334-445 1 triangle union 7 445-655 1 triangle union 10 655-534 1 triangle union 10 534-454 1 triangle union 10 454-345 1 triangle union 8 345-556 1 triangle union 10 556-334 1 triangle union 8 334-445 1 triangle union8 445-444 1 triangle union 8 current combination 444 -3 I know exactly what will be the next sequence and therefore in the end we will definitely get - 1 triangle union 8 This will be my entry point in time. know the volatility of the pound and therefore 100% take this volatility but most importantly, I know from the sequence of these series when exactly this volatility will be worked out and how long it will take question - can this be called an algorithm? who do I believe more, some idiot who is talking about trading volumes, averaging or what I see with my own eyes and these sequences have not changed for more than 50 years This is flat volatility, the trend has the same number series, and the difference is only in volatility, trend volatility is greater than flat volatility since the sequence of combining 3 triangles into 1 triangle, I just have to wait for the unifying peak and close the whole deal in profit
#319 Yesterday at 3:04 PM here the same sequences only for a different time interval their minimum value is not less than 2 maximum does not exceed 7 and the union cannot be less than 4 and more than 13 thus having only one point, it’s not difficult to calculate the subsequent construction, and knowing the volatility allows you to take profit at the peak of compound 3 in 1
Since the numerical sequence of a short period of time in terms of the number of structures and volatility should converge at the junction point of the older time interval, all that remains is simply guaranteed to take this profit unlike you morons - smart people use technical analysis and on its basis form a trading system with a guaranteed profit, and not like you idiots - rely on luck
The only problem for the mathematician, he does not know to which reference interval this series of numbers belongs and how the fool chooses the extreme price, opening - closing the candle, etc. And he relies on various variables. there are no variables in this algorithm - this is a clear sequence eliminating and random walk and averaging, etc.