Thank you. Ok, so what are the 8 possible market designs in any given direction? From the charts you have posted, none show annotations beyond the HRE. This would graphically back up your text assertions. Are the Gartley patterns in your charts what you are referring to as the 'market designs?' edit: my mistake, you do have annotations going beyond the HRE.
Gartley patterns, these are fragments of the overall picture of market design, it does not make sense to consider them separately, they should be interconnected, then the picture will become clear
if you are a specialist in technical analysis, then this layout will not be difficult for you to understand that shows the matching of the price model of the month with weeks
all that remains is to wait for confirmation of the completion of the formation the other day Please note that the formation time is always almost the same. intermediate models from 2 to 6 weeks basic from 6 to 12 weeks here it’s not difficult to understand that a month consists of 4-5 weeks, therefore it’s easy to calculate when there should be a rollback
Volatility also did not change from 5,000 points to 14,000 points. minimum inherent to flat, maximum trend, average 7000 points
this data makes it easy to calculate the interval of 15 minutes #17 Nov 3, 2019 Unlike Gartley, I always have 9 price movements. A fractal can be internal or external - it does not matter, it is associated with volatility And the 3 in 3 sequence gives a definite answer about the end of the trend unlike Gartley patterns, it’s easy for me to relate the build time to volatility, and because of this, it’s easy to calculate the trend rollback
in this case, all that remains is to find the reference points, program an indicator that will consistently combine three triangles into a 1 triangle and add volatility since this principle has not been violated for more than 70 years and volatility is always unchanged, there are no problems calculating any instrument at any time interval