Orly Taitz Claims She Can Have President Obama "Out Of Office In 30 Days"

http://mediamattersaction.org/video/200909140004


A few quick snippets... Judge David Carter, Central District of California, ordered early discovery; Obama has 30 days to produce his records, including his hospital, birth certificate, name of doctor, and all of the signatures.



This is apparently in reaction to many recent discoveries and claims that are getting harder and harder to ridicule as just a bunch of lunatic 'crazies':
-An affidavit and (very real looking) hospital birth record from Kenya's Coast Province Hospital,

-A (very real looking) birth certificate from Kenya'a Coast Province for Barack Hussein Obama II,

-The nagging reminder that Obama's Hawaiian 'Certificate of Live Birth' was printed with a laserprinter after November 2001 (see the bottom left corner),

-Recent discovery that (before 1972) the Hawaiian territory allowed foreigners to register births there using the COLB form.

-A recent discovery that the DNC avoided certifying to the 50 states that Obama was eligible under the Constition,

 

And in another 60 days Obama is still going to be President of the US.

 

Doesn't really matter. The people are going to throw this degenerate, Acorn loving asshole Obama out of office come 2012. After the 2010 congressional elections, Obama will be powerless for the rest of his dictatorship.

 

Yawn.

When the "No! I don't wanna' I don't wanna!" Republican whiners stop plunging in the polls, let us all know.

jfuckette's problem is that he doesn't have any mirrors in his house, apparently.

Hey jfuckette, good luck with Palin and Glenn Beck leading the GOP during this dynamic and rapidly changing American demographic trend.

 

U.S. District Court Judge Clay Land has thrown out a complaint questioning the president's birth from an Army captain fighting deployment to Iraq and gave a warning to her lawyer, birther maven Orly Taitz.

Land also put attorney Orly Taitz, who represents Capt. Connie Rhodes and is a leader in the national "birther" movement, on notice by stating that she could face sanctions if she ever files a similar "frivolous" lawsuit in his court.


"(Rhodes) has presented no credible evidence and has made no reliable factual allegations to support her unsubstantiated, conclusory allegations and conjecture that President Obama is ineligible to serve as president of the United States," Land states in his order. "Instead, she uses her complaint as a platform for spouting political rhetoric, such as her claims that the president is 'an illegal usurper, an unlawful pretender, [and] an unqualified

 

Why did he even hear it? Don't they read the case before they hear it? Our courts system must be really awful.

 

Who do you think the judges boss is? Thats why he didnt hear it.

 

The court papers : Court ruling

Basically the case stems from a someone who has her education and training paid for by the taxpayer but refuses to fulfill her military obligation.

From court (copy and paste was a little rough):

To press her “birther agenda,” Plaintiff’s counsel has filed the
present action on behalf of Captain Rhodes. Captain Rhodes entered the Army in March of 2005 and presently serves as a medical doctor. The American taxpayers paid for her third and fourth years of medical school and financially supported her during her subsequent medical internship and residency program. In exchange for this valuable free medical education, Captain Rhodes agreed to serve two years in active
service in the Army. She began that term of active service in July
of 2008 and had no concerns about fulfilling her military obligation
until she received orders notifying her that she would be deployed to Iraq in September of 2009.


First, Plaintiff’s challenge to her deployment
order is frivolous. She has presented no credible evidence and has made no reliable factual allegations to support her unsubstantiated, conclusory allegations and conjecture that President Obama is ineligible to serve as President of the United States. Instead, she uses her Complaint as a platform for spouting political rhetoric, such as her claims that the President is “an illegal usurper, an unlawful pretender, [and] an unqualified imposter.” (Compl. ¶ 21.) She continues with bare, conclusory allegations that the President is “an alien, possibly even an unnaturalized or even an unadmitted illegal alien . . . without so much as lawful residency in the United States.” (Id. ¶ 26.) Then, implying that the President is either awandering nomad or a prolific identity fraud crook, she alleges that the President “might have used as many as 149 addresses and 39 social security numbers prior to assuming the office of President.” (Id. ¶ 110 (emphasis added).) Acknowledging the existence of a document
that shows the President was born in Hawaii, Plaintiff alleges that
the document “cannot be verified as genuine, and should be presumed fraudulent.” (Id. ¶ 113 (emphasis added).) In further support of her claim, Plaintiff relies upon “the general opinion in the rest of the world” that “Barack Hussein Obama has, in essence, slipped through the guardrails to become President.” (Id. ¶ 128.)

Moreover, as though the “general opinion in the rest of the world” were not enough, Plaintiff alleges in her Complaint that according to an “AOL poll 85% of Americans believe that Obama was not vetted, needs to be vetted and his vital records need to be produced.” (Id. ¶ 154.) Finally, in a remarkable shifting of the traditional legal burden of proof, Plaintiff unashamedly alleges that Defendant has the burden to prove his “natural born” status. (Id. ¶¶ 136-138, 148.) Thus, Plaintiff’s counsel, who champions herself as a defender of liberty and freedom, seeks to use the power of the judiciary to compel a citizen, albeit the President of the United States, to “prove his innocence” to “charges” that are based upon conjecture and
speculation. Any middle school civics student would readily
recognize the irony of abandoning fundamental principles upon which our Country was founded in order to purportedly “protect and preserve” those very principles.

---------

Lemme get this straight, Obama beat out his democratic field for the nomination and then the republican candidate, who in total had to have spent more than $100 million on their campaigns and not a single one of them ever questioned his birth place, yet some piker of an attorney cites an AOL poll among the other nonsense as a reason the Obama shouldn't be President.

The, "implying that the President is either awandering nomad or a prolific identity fraud crook, she alleges that the President 'might have used as many as 149 addresses and 39 social security numbers prior to assuming the office of President,'” is really indescribable . Seriously how fucking stupid do you have to be to even consider trying to float that one past the court.

 

I never cease to be amazed at how stupid some people can be.

He did go up against the Clinton Machine in the primary race. If there was anything there you can bet your bottom dollar that they would have found it.

 

Judge Land is some kind of AZZHOLE!

It's up to a candidate to provide proof and verification of his eligibility to be included on the ballot.

Obviously, Obama has stonewalled information and offered something other than "legitimate, acceptable proof" of eligibility... and it's being rightfully contested.

I'm sure the Powers have sent instructions down to the courts to deflect challenges.... sad times in America...