Option replication and exotics journal

Discussion in 'Journals' started by riskarb, Jul 14, 2005.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. Dax double barrier[binary k/o range] -- 4820/4980 K/Os
    Premium: $59,500 EUR
    Payout: $150,000 EUR [includes prem paid]
    Expires: Aug 10, 2005
    Negative edge: $8,100 EUR
    Neutrality: 4900 basis DAX cash

    Been following the gammas on this one and the broker is offering it under $60k. Bought it a few minutes ago.
     
    #71     Aug 3, 2005
  2. I thought I'd amend this journal to add long butterflies. I run an account that strictly-packages butterflies and the occasional condor. I thought it would be interesting to discuss the various natural and synthetic butterflies and some inherent advantages.

    Short gamma/vega will be expressed as long butterflies; irons and synthetics included. I trade roughly equal numbers of natural flys and converted combo:fly positions. I will try to be consistent with terminology.

    The goal is to trade the natural flys to a 1:1 reward. This only concerns flys which were purchased as naturals[netted]. I won't follow this r/r when legging/converting a combination-fly[iron or synthetic].

    A majority of flys will be straddle[natural&synthetic] sales converted to iron-flys through the purchase of the wing-combo at some time in the future... possibly same-day, but up to a week. The goal of the conversion is an net-arbitrage-credit on the position[post-conversion], so that: net credit rec'd > distance between strikes, ignoring sign.

    All legged/converted positions will consist of an initial short combo[downside-gamma] followed by the purchase of the wing combo[upside-gamma]. Downside/upside refers to the curvature of gamma, not a directional-bias.
     
    #72     Aug 3, 2005
  3. Potential fly conversion:

    Sold x GOOG Sep 300 straddles at $25.30 & 30.30% vols. Market was 25.20x25.60 on ISE's spread/combo order line.

    280/320 wing combo is trading at 10.30x10.70 & avg. 31.00% vols.

    Have not purchased the wing combo -- netted fly is trading at [$14.80], risk of $5.20.

    The goal is to earn decay at the risk of gamma while earning opportunity theta on the wing combo within a week's time. Doubtful we'll see more than 2-3 points reduction in the current mark on the fly. We'll see, but I'd like to own the completed fly at a risk of $2.60 or lower.
     
    #73     Aug 3, 2005
  4. Edit: it's a long vol-box. Still watching it, at least the corrs are moving my way.
     
    #74     Aug 3, 2005
  5. Short 20 FDAX from 4894 avg.
     
    #75     Aug 4, 2005
  6. Trade rationale pasted from another thread:

    The gamma:theta is linear. Since the atm straddle is downside-gamma[curvature] there is spot-vol concerns expressed as delta-position. Obviously gamma drives the delta, but the gamma isn't geared in the straddle.

    I expect GOOG spot vols to decline to the 28-vol-line[from 30v] for the atm combo. The daily vols have been spotty, but generally mean-reverting to the 300 handle. I don't see a lot of directional-vol in the shares. The wings exhibit opportunity greeks, as my hand is not forced if my spot vol prediction is correct, and the potential vol/theta gains from the wings are replicated by buying the wings < current offer on that combo.

    Add to that, the wing vol is high due to the prevailing 200basis in call skew on the 20d otm vol-line. There is still some hope by the public that the stock will exhibit upside vol, which i don't expect, so a flattening of the smile will help.

    Summary: The edge will be expressed by a larger credit on the converted iron fly than is currently possible.
     
    #76     Aug 4, 2005
  7. Short 30 FDAX from 4886 avg.
     
    #77     Aug 4, 2005

  8. Covered at 4839 avg. +35k
     
    #78     Aug 5, 2005
  9. Interesting thread. Thanks for starting it, and I hope you'll run with it for as long as you feel like. I suspect I'll learn a lot from it.

    Thanks again,
    Steve
     
    #79     Aug 8, 2005
  10. Nice calls - what was your rationale for these two?
     
    #80     Aug 8, 2005
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.