Open letter to Baron

Discussion in 'Feedback' started by gunslinger, Feb 21, 2008.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. :confused:

    Steve, I don't remember doing that. All I asked you was about your reasons to call Rearden a con artist. And frankly, the ones you gave about the military and acknowledging a drug problem hardly makes him a con artist.

    And about Bob Rowshan, I don't have much idea about him either. :confused:

    Please don't put words into my mouth. :mad:
     
    #111     Mar 11, 2008
  2. Ok, valid question. Someone asked you to provide the link where that paragraph came from, and I was waiting for you to do so before commenting.
     
    #112     Mar 11, 2008
  3. volente_00

    volente_00

    It is not to hard to find. Search is your friend
     
    #113     Mar 11, 2008
  4. You're right Hermit.

    It was Cutten who had the balls to come out and tell us about Rowshan's aliases and his being banned. I got you two mixed up
    and I apologize...

    Doesn't change Rowshan's status as a con artist, nor does it affect my opinion of Rearden.

    and its interesting that Rearden wants to make shitty comments about my family's loss but can't be bothered to do the leg work to insure that he makes an accurate comment....This is the mark of a self-absorbed drug addict. This asshole needs some attention, and he doesn't give a shit who he hurts in the process as long as he gets what he needs. Sounds like a drug addict to me...

    Let us know when you get clean
     
    #114     Mar 11, 2008
  5. Truer words never spoken.
    Translation: yes, i (bozente) am exactly the type of troll Rearden has described above. I (bozente) intentionally left out the preceding sentence because it would put the entire message (see below) in proper context, and I (bozente) certainly don't want to do that. I (bozente) am the ultimate loser/troll.

    "According to the Associated Press, the city identified over 1,600 bodies but was unable to identify the rest (about 1,100 people). They report that the city has "about 10,000 unidentified bone and tissue fragments that cannot be matched to the list of the dead."

    see link:
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/September_11,_2001_attacks
    last paragraph in "fatalities"
     
    #115     Mar 11, 2008
  6. "Pretending to beleive your crap"?

    The AP reporter wrote the article cited above a long time ago. Rearden had plenty of time to read it....I referred to it MANY times but that would have meant having to apologize....At least thats what a decent human being would have done....But you have to remember that we are talking about a drug addict, and a con artist, neither of whom have much in the way of character, and apparently neither of whom have any conscience...

    Anybody interested can read Rearden's last post.....to the END this poor bastard continues to wiggle around, trying to avoid having to admit he's wrong....like any con artist he figures if he just continues to state the same bullshit....someone will believe it....and the longer he goes on...the more people here figure it out and get pissed...

    Baron I think you should toss these two assholes off the site...and the sooner the better...Rearden is the "Elliot Spitzer" of this website...and Rowshan is just a simple bullshit artist...

    Get rid of this Internet trash and you'll have a much better business in the long run...



    Thanks
    Steve
     
    #116     Mar 11, 2008
  7. steve46, you are even dumber than i originally thought (which is saying something). This AP report shows w 100% certainty that you are LYING. Even w 1100 or so still unidentified in this press release from 2001, they already knew pretty much exactly how many people had perished (1600 +1100).

    steve46, you are a big POS for lying about losing family members in 9/11. Period. Now leave ET in shame.

    http://www.elitetrader.com/vb/showthread.php?s=&postid=1192720&highlight=family+members#post1192720
     
    #117     Mar 11, 2008
  8. OK, this report doesn't seem to open the door to the possibility of additional off-list victims at all. (1,600+1,100=2,700)

    Why don't these 10,000 fragments match up? I can think of numerous possibilities: Perhaps the fragments were so badly damaged/incinerated that no precise DNA sequences are readable.

    Perhaps some of this material is animal, not human. (Not just animals killed in the attacks, but also from all the tons (literally) of meat items present in the WTC before the attacks.

    Another possibility: DNA analysis takes a ton of time, effort & money. There are still people in U.S. prisons who were falsely convicted back in the pre-DNA era of crimes they didn't commit.
    Many of these people have been waiting (behind bars) for years for the gov't to finally re-examine the DNA evidence relevant to their case. Maybe when faced with the choice of expending thousands of dollars and dozens of man-hours of scientist work, pre-DNA convicts were given priority over pea-sized WTC bone fragments that may not even be human.
    I don't know- That's just a couple thoughts off the top of my head.

    This entire discussion is pointless anyways; The families of 9/11 victims were compensated by the gov't & various charities with 7-figure settlements. That leaves us with only two possibilities:
    A) Steve, a known serial bullshitter who's made numerous laughably false claims in this thread alone, lied about his family members dying on 9/11. Or,
    B) Steve was telling the truth, but his family just couldn't be bothered to put themselves on the victims' lists and receive their multi-million dollar compensation packages. They have <i>far</i> better things to do than fill out a few forms and collect a truckload of cash... like telling lies on the internet, for example.
    After turning down this 7-figure payment, my generous $15,000 offer certainly wasn't worth the bother to them either.

    A third possibility? There isn't one. You're either a liar or a $X,XXX,XXX.00 money-refusing idiot Steve, and I think we all know which one is correct.
     
    #118     Mar 11, 2008
  9. RM, the 10,000 fragments didn't match up at the time when there were still 1100 unidentified missing fatalities. Aside from your fully reasonable explanations for this, there's the obvious one that most of these fragments actually belonged to people not on the list yet ie the 1100 yet identified.

    I wouldn't be surprised if more fragments are found in coming years. of course, that doesn't mean at all that some victims have not yet been recognized. EVERYONE has been accounted for and paid well. Everyone who lost a loved one in 9/11 was compensated.
     
    #119     Mar 11, 2008
  10. Keep on wiggling you poor pathetic bastards...

    For you everything is about the money....and THAT is one of the marks of a con artist.

    You were wrong from the beginning...You're wrong now, and people are starting to get pissed at your fucking game...

    Too bad Rearden, it looks to everyone here as though YOU are the "Elliot Spitzer of ET"........

    The "Sheriff of ET" get his ass handed to him again....

    Poor bastard, I am almost feeling sorry for you...except for the fact that you continue to act like an asshole...But then thats characteristic of drugs addicts...they just can't admit that they have a problem...:)

    I gotta say, I am fucking loving this...watching you two pathetic silly bastards trying like mad to find ANY WAY TO WIGGLE OUT OF THIS....its like a bad dream and it keeps getting worse...

    How does it feel Rearden to have everyone on ET know what a friggin horses ass you are...?

    You think anyone here is going to take you seriously now? Tell you what...I will be here to link to this thread every time you show up....you friggin dirtbag
     
    #120     Mar 12, 2008
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.