Open carry children’s book draws ire of left-wing ‘journalists’

In another episode of the continuing series of anti gun nuts on parade, the death of James Brady has been ruled a homicide. From a gunshot would he took to the head over thirty years ago. As if people are too stupid to figure out the political motivation behind this announcement.

When a soldier suffers injuries and dies thirty years after a war, are they going to start declaring that he was killed in action?

 

There? Did you try googling "gun control"? I'll bet you'll get at least a couple of hits. Then you can rebut each point, one by one, and before you know it, you'll have your stickie. Maybe luc will add the cartoons and videos that constitute his party piece, and you'll be all set.

Looking forward to it.

 

I'm trying to debate the point with you, not google. But it appears that you have nothing of substance to say, and that's ok. I'm used to it from you.

 

Debunking “A Dummy’s Guide to Winning Gun Control Debates”

http://www.thetruthaboutguns.com/20...-dummys-guide-to-winning-gun-control-debates/

 

Kinda like we did with prohibition in the 20's and 30's? Or more like our multi-decade war on drugs now?

Or maybe you think "it's different THIS time"?

 

Yes, of course you are. So I find all this stuff for you which you are perfectly capable of finding for yourself and you rebut point by point as usual and I've wasted my time.

Given that you think dead children are an acceptable consequence of gun ownership, there's really no place to go with this.

 

LOL
One of the anti gun loon's biggest meme's

Millions and millions of children have been murdered and or orphaned because of gun control

 

Given the "LOL", there is, as I said, really no place to go with this.

 

AGAIN you prove without question you have absolutely NOTHING to bolster your "argument".

Well...nothing but girly man emotions, misinformation, ignorance and empty rhetoric.

 

See, this is why it's pointless to debate gun rights with these people.

There is no compromise possible because they view any concession as the floor for further erosion of our rights. Would liberals debate outlawing labor unions? Would they be willing to agree to "common sense" restrictions? Never. They know who writes their checks.