Oops. Why God Did Not Create the Universe

Discussion in 'Politics' started by Optionpro007, Sep 6, 2010.

  1. Stu for years has been saying there is no evidence of a Creator.

    I have been saying that top scientists say our universe appears designed.

    You tell me who is in the bullshit loop?

    thats right stu, I am typing on my office machine.
    you know non trolls leave their cave.
     
    #161     Sep 17, 2010
  2. Irrefutable proof that we are indeed the center of the universe....:D



    <iframe src="http://player.vimeo.com/video/14352658" width="400" height="225" frameborder="0"></iframe><p><a href="http://vimeo.com/14352658">Timelapse Montage</a> from <a href="http://vimeo.com/mikeflores">Mike Flores</a> on <a href="http://vimeo.com">Vimeo</a>.</p>
     
    #162     Sep 21, 2010
  3. Look at all the phallic geological artifacts, therefore God created the Universe. But you don't get to use agnostic arguments to defend christianity. Whatever or however existence came into being is beyond the realm of even the most studied
    physicists in history and esp. ambitious primitive sheep herders.
    Nice music and film though, was that Wagner?
     
    #163     Sep 21, 2010
  4. No idea.
     
    #164     Sep 21, 2010
  5. stu

    stu

    ....except that, the laws of physics allow a universe to be created out of nothing.
     
    #165     Sep 22, 2010

  6. Theres a sequece for how science posits towards Truth, it goes GTFOH --> HYPOTHESIS --> THEORY --> LAW. What you're hinting at is The Big Bang THEORY, not law. Whereas Lester Hillbilly on too many of my cable channels, with his dyed black hair and the too expensive for his brainpower suit thinks that HE knows the answer to the source of our very existence. Think of scientists as the bottom line in who is credible as detectives for the Truth. No, scientists aren't nearly as cocksure about how Existence began before the Theory of the Big Bang and probably never will be; they have too much integrity for that. If we admit that Existence can be explained by reason the possibility for Existence is destroyed.
     
    #166     Sep 22, 2010
  7. Lucrum

    Lucrum

    <object width="480" height="385"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/G_DV54ddNHE?fs=1&amp;hl=en_US"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/G_DV54ddNHE?fs=1&amp;hl=en_US" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="480" height="385"></embed></object>
     
    #167     Sep 22, 2010
  8. jem

    jem

    You keep saying that - yet you refuse to explain how...
    You really do not want to admit that you are using that statement without understanding it.
     
    #168     Sep 22, 2010
  9. Like the "law" of gravity? I hate to break it to you but human physicists only have THEORIES of gravitation.

    <object width="480" height="385"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/LaOcuNzm0uU?fs=1&amp;hl=en_US"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/LaOcuNzm0uU?fs=1&amp;hl=en_US" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="480" height="385"></embed></object>

     
    #169     Sep 22, 2010
  10. stu

    stu

    I admit I am using that statement without you understanding it.
     
    #170     Sep 22, 2010