Greenhouse gasses are necessary to support life and the co2 in our atmosphere is .0004 ... and we need it to live. It is not a danger to us, it is not a pollutant. Classifying is as such would mean that we humans are all polluting the earth every time we breath. If you think its a pollutant, you should really ask a tree or a plant if what they think. lol To them, it's oxygen... Millions of years ago there was actually more co2 then we have now. People need to stop believing the hype of "global warming" and understand that we are all under attack by people who are seeking to financially enslave us... The marketing dept of the UN had to even change the name to "climate change" from "global warming" because the planet wasn't cooperating with them and started cooling ten years ago as part of it's natural cycle. Climate will change, it has for millions of years and will continue to do so and Co2 gives life to our vegetation and helps produce more and better food and in return, they give life to us and all of earths animals via oxygen and food... Its the cycle of life. People really need to stop watching so called experts and stop letting them do our thinking for us... Our state run media has turned into a powerful propaganda machine. Common sense and critical thinking seems to be a thing of the past as we are overloaded with information, false information everyday. If one would ask themselves what motives our "rulers" (yes we have rulers) have in taking the route they have chosen, figure out the why's, then one can figure out the how's, they will be as plain as day... Then and only then, we can all throw our TV's out the the window and go outside and breath in some of that beautiful oxygen that all that co2 helped produce.... http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Phanerozoic_Carbon_Dioxide.png http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2009/06/090618143950.htm http://www.universityofcalifornia.edu/news/article/22071 Nick
Science czar's guru called for more carbon CO2 promoted as greenhouse gas needed to fight global starvation In the 1950s, before climate scientists had targeted carbon dioxide as a dangerous chemical, atomic scientist Harrison Brown, one of Obama science czar Eric Holdren's acknowledged gurus, called for a global increase in carbon dioxide, precisely because of its perceived greenhouse gas effects. Harrison Brown â a geochemist who supervised the production of plutonium for the Manhattan Project â wrote in his 1954 Malthusian book "The Challenge of Man's Future" that the production of the food needed to feed an increasing world population could be advanced by human-manipulated greenhouse effects, including forcing carbon dioxide into the atmosphere. In 1986, science czar Holdren co-edited a scientific reader, "Earth and the Human Future: Essays in Honor of Harrison Brown." In one of his introductory essays written for the book, Holdren acknowledged he read Brown's "The Challenge of Man's Future" when he was in high school and that the book had a profound effect on his intellectual development. Holdren acknowledged Brown's book transformed his thinking about the world and "about the sort of career I wanted to pursue." Holdren further commented in glowing terms that Brown's book was a work "that should have reshaped permanently the perceptions of all serious analysts about the interactions of the demographic, biological geophysical, technological, economic and sociopolitical dimensions of contemporary problems." Pump more gas Lamenting on page 140 that "the earth's atmosphere contains only a minute concentration â about 0.03 percent" â Brown observed, "It has been demonstrated that a tripling of carbon-dioxide concentration in the air will approximately double the growth rates of tomatoes, alfalfa, and sugar beets." http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=118304
B*S* this was clealry explained in the youtube video with the best non biased explanation I hav ever some across. and how true when he says "it's amazing how the public jump onboard the blogs written by the MCclimateoligists, who look out of their window on a cold winters day and proclaim G.W. is a scam becasue it's cold here today..." I have many of these amateur blogs claiming GW is not real......but where is the real scientific proof of this? Oh that's right....there isn't any. how can a mechanic in New Jersey ranting on a blog have any scientifit proof? They do not. They are pissed about higher taxes, politicians etc so they joing the great "A.G.W." camp and feel great about it. If you actually stand back and leave the extra taxes out of it for now, and look at the science on a 100% pure objective view....I think you will find man made G.W. is real and happening. As for you lot saying GWers are liars, BSers, etc....you wil lfind there are many more liars in the A.G.W. camp. That Australian Pr** on youtube (Bob someone) isn't even a qualified climeatologist... and that guy who made the film "The Great G.W. scam" has a degree in History... LOL. I'll bet many or getting perks and pay offs from big oil companies. Yes there is corruption and people are trying to make money from it which is a real shame but if you see past this you might actually see the truth. There again many have clealry mad etheir minds up already and that's about that. ------------------------------------------------ Millions of years ago there was actually more co2 then we have now. People need to stop believing the hype of "global warming" and understand that we are all under attack by people who are seeking to financially enslave us...
just watch the first video... http://www.youtube.com/Cop15 and here is Al... http://www.google.com/landing/cop15/ And here there is HOPE : http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pA6FSy6EKrM&feature=featured
I have always thought it to be no more than a forum for money to be made off of those who assume others know more than they do what is good for themselves.
<object width="425" height="344"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/Bv5k-qWfKJI&color1=0xb1b1b1&color2=0xcfcfcf&hl=en_US&feature=player_embedded&fs=1"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowScriptAccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/Bv5k-qWfKJI&color1=0xb1b1b1&color2=0xcfcfcf&hl=en_US&feature=player_embedded&fs=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowfullscreen="true" allowScriptAccess="always" width="425" height="344"></embed></object> Hello, Iâm Jim Inhofe, a Republican from Oklahoma. I am the top Republican on the Senate Environment and Public Works Committee. Today, the Obama administration announced an unprecedented rule, one that will have far-reaching implications for each and every American. The Administrationâs endangerment finding will lead to a wave of new regulations and bureaucracy that will wreak havoc on the American economy, destroy millions of jobs, and force consumers to pay more for electricity and gasoline.
Copenhagen: the AGW druids at Copenhagen know they are on a losing wicket and it shows Climategate is the elephant in the room, the skeleton at the feast. Scepticism was supposed to have been eliminated by now; instead, it has captured majority opinion. It is untrue to say that Britain is split 50-50 â though that, in itself, would be a defeat for warmists â close study of all the surveys shows that scepticism was running at closer to 60 per cent â before Climategate even broke. The script said that man-made global warming was to be regarded as an established fact, that sceptics should not even be given the courtesy of an argument. http://blogs.telegraph.co.uk/news/g...now-they-are-on-a-losing-wicket-and-it-shows/
Perhaps ET should force posters to pass a 5th-grade level grammar test and score 75+ on an IQ test before posting. It's no wonder why some are so easily duped...