One reason liberals are idiots when it comes to global warming

Discussion in 'Politics' started by gastropod, Jan 18, 2014.

  1. LEAPup

    LEAPup

    Maybe fc should turn off the heat in whatever he lives in, then tell us tomorrow morning what he thinks. After all, according to him and his retarded buddies, we should be under water by now.
     
    #51     Jan 21, 2014
  2. I am going to ask FC to do something that has been absent from the left for decades!

    FC, will you please THINK FOR YOURSELF ????? Please consider: The same 97% of "scientists" who believe AGW...are the same knucklebrains who can't tell you a weather forecast 30 days out!!!!! Think FC - think! The "science" is garbage, if it can't even work for a simple 30 day forecast! The original statement about the lack of the ability on a 30 day forecast and the comparison to the AGW crowd was from AN MIT CLIMATE SCIENTIST! I think that guy was honest...the others...bullsh!tters!!!
     
    #52     Jan 21, 2014
  3. gwb-trading

    gwb-trading

    Time for the 97% Retarded Parrot
    [​IMG]
     
    #53     Jan 21, 2014
  4. LEAPup

    LEAPup

    He is et's troll of the year. Pretty much says it all...
     
    #54     Jan 21, 2014
  5. 97% of the climate scientists. Virtually all of the science organizations and this.

    [​IMG]


    You deniers are just plain fucking stupid.

    The 97% Consensus Results
    Based on our abstract ratings, we found that just over 4,000 papers expressed a position on the cause of global warming, 97.1% of which endorsed human-caused global warming. In the self-ratings, nearly 1,400 papers were rated as taking a position, 97.2% of which endorsed human-caused global warming.

    We found that about two-thirds of papers didn't express a position on the subject in the abstract, which confirms that we were conservative in our initial abstract ratings. This result isn't surprising for two reasons: 1) most journals have strict word limits for their abstracts, and 2) frankly, every scientist doing climate research knows humans are causing global warming. There's no longer a need to state something so obvious. For example, would you expect every geological paper to note in its abstract that the Earth is a spherical body that orbits the sun?

    This result was also predicted by Oreskes (2007), which noted that scientists

    "...generally focus their discussions on questions that are still disputed or unanswered rather than on matters about which everyone agrees"

    However, according to the author self-ratings, nearly two-thirds of the papers in our survey do express a position on the subject somewhere in the paper.

    We also found that the consensus has strengthened gradually over time. The slow rate reflects that there has been little room to grow, because the consensus on human-caused global warming has generally always been over 90% since 1991. Nevertheless, in both the abstract ratings and self-ratings, we found that the consensus has grown to about 98% as of 2011.
     
    #55     Jan 21, 2014
  6. gwb, stating facts does not make one a parrot, but denying them as you do makes one an idiot,

    The following scientific organizations endorse the consensus position that "most of the global warming in recent decades can be attributed to human activities":

    American Association for the Advancement of Science
    American Astronomical Society
    American Chemical Society
    American Geophysical Union
    American Institute of Physics
    American Meteorological Society
    American Physical Society
    Australian Meteorological and Oceanographic Society
    Australian Bureau of Meteorology and the CSIRO
    British Antarctic Survey
    Canadian Foundation for Climate and Atmospheric Sciences
    Canadian Meteorological and Oceanographic Society
    Environmental Protection Agency
    European Federation of Geologists
    European Geosciences Union
    European Physical Society
    Federation of American Scientists
    Federation of Australian Scientific and Technological Societies
    Geological Society of America
    Geological Society of Australia
    Geological Society of London
    International Union for Quaternary Research (INQUA)
    International Union of Geodesy and Geophysics
    National Center for Atmospheric Research
    National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
    Royal Meteorological Society
    Royal Society of the UK
    The Academies of Science from 19 different countries all endorse the consensus. 13 countries have signed a joint statement endorsing the consensus position:

    Academia Brasiliera de Ciencias (Brazil)
    Royal Society of Canada
    Chinese Academy of Sciences
    Academie des Sciences (France)
    Deutsche Akademie der Naturforscher Leopoldina (Germany)
    Indian National Science Academy
    Accademia dei Lincei (Italy)
    Science Council of Japan
    Academia Mexicana de Ciencias (Mexico)
    Russian Academy of Sciences
    Academy of Science of South Africa
    Royal Society (United Kingdom)
    National Academy of Sciences (USA) (12 Mar 2009 news release)
    A letter from 18 scientific organizations to US Congress states:

    "Observations throughout the world make it clear that climate change is occurring, and rigorous scientific research demonstrates that the greenhouse gases emitted by human activities are the primary driver. These conclusions are based on multiple independent lines of evidence, and contrary assertions are inconsistent with an objective assessment of the vast body of peer-reviewed science."
    The consensus is also endorsed by a Joint statement by the Network of African Science Academies (NASAC), including the following bodies:

    African Academy of Sciences
    Cameroon Academy of Sciences
    Ghana Academy of Arts and Sciences
    Kenya National Academy of Sciences
    Madagascar's National Academy of Arts, Letters and Sciences
    Nigerian Academy of Sciences
    l'Académie des Sciences et Techniques du Sénégal
    Uganda National Academy of Sciences
    Academy of Science of South Africa
    Tanzania Academy of Sciences
    Zimbabwe Academy of Sciences
    Zambia Academy of Sciences
    Sudan Academy of Sciences
    Other Academies of Sciences that endorse the consensus:

    Australian Academy of Science
    Royal Society of New Zealand
    Polish Academy of Sciences
     
    #56     Jan 21, 2014
  7. Yeah sure jerm. Your "logic" is ridiculous and a joke.

    It really is 97%. For all practical purposes.
    Oh maybe it's 96%


    Multiple studies, surveys and statements all confirm it.

    Virtually the entire world's science community is in agreement.

    To deny that makes you an idiot.



     
    #57     Jan 21, 2014
  8. gwb-trading

    gwb-trading

    [​IMG]
     
    #58     Jan 21, 2014
  9. Hey gwb. I guess these guys are all liberals huh? A bunch of dummies? Check out what they say. Do you know what the word incontrovertible means? Of course you don't. Look it up.

    American Meteorological Society

    "It is clear from extensive scientific evidence that the dominant cause of the rapid change in climate of the past half century is human-induced increases in the amount of atmospheric greenhouse gases, including carbon dioxide (CO2), chlorofluorocarbons, methane, and nitrous oxide." (2012)7

    American Physical Society

    "The evidence is incontrovertible: Global warming is occurring. If no mitigating actions are taken, significant disruptions in the Earth’s physical and ecological systems, social systems, security and human health are likely to occur. We must reduce emissions of greenhouse gases beginning now."
     
    #59     Jan 21, 2014
  10. gwb-trading

    gwb-trading

    [​IMG]
     
    #60     Jan 22, 2014