Again, show evidence for the claim made in the first post after one and a half year of 'complaint', you are adding irrelevant generalizations to distract from your specific claim that has no evidence other than some right wing group trying to 'muh both sides' it.
Yet.... you can't explain why Democrats are pushing so hard in multiple states to allow "ballot harvesting".
So you got no answer for the claim made in the first post of your thread and you expect me to engage on claims made later on? I accept your surrender once again.
Quite amusing.... why don't you become a political operative and go collect some ballots for Democrats. The claims made in election involving Rachel Hunt are all fully documented in the links/sub-links posted at the beginning of the thread. It includes news articles, the North Carolina Values Coalition complaint,, plus the submissions to the election board and legal documents. You can go read through it in detail --- basically the "harvesting of ballots" in this election was directly akin the harvesting in the District 9 election. Either the same rules apply to all races or they should not apply to any.
As predicted, you provide no sources for your claim, no links to any conclusion from ANY investigation about a complaint made over a year ago while asking people to read non-existent proof of your bullshit claims. Never change, this is why you are a Republican in the first place, dishonest and disingenuous.
As obviously written in the article - the Democratic-controlled election board refused to investigate the complaint -- that's where it ended. They claimed it was "too late to look into it". All the sources including the complaint and the response are fully documented in this thread. The last two sentences in one WRAL article summarized the Democratic thinking - At any rate, Cohen and Dickerson both said it's too late to challenge any of the votes the coalition flagged. "That ship has sailed," Dickerson said. The only thing that is clear is that Rachel Hunt will likely lose this seat in 2020 . The former incumbent Republican Bill Brawley has a significant lead on her in the polls.
Are all the Republicans in NC dead or absolute cucks to not take the matter further? A complaint by some kook right wing group is not enough to draw conclusions given how Republicans love habitual lying.
Let's take a look at the actual situation in more detail from the state political perspective. 1) Seating Rachel Hunt did not change the make-up of the NC House - Republicans still held a majority. 2) Challenging the seating of the daughter of a former governor who was popular across the state has significant political risks to the Republicans. 3) Seating her allowed the Republicans to make a big deal over the "ballot harvesting" issue -- "ballot harvesting" traditionally in our state has helped Democrats. 4)They knew that the Democrats would object to the "ballot harvesting" rules passed in the legislature. It gave them a great drum to beat for the 2020 elections about "look at those crooked Democrats they are at it again". You need to keep in mind that Democrats held power in North Carolina for over 100 years until 2010. They lost power after over 20 Democrats were prosecuted by the Feds for election fraud and financial fraud including Gov. Easley. Most were locked in prison for many years. After this the people in North Carolina had enough and voted Republicans into power. In 2010 most Republicans in state races ran on platforms of "its time to stop the Democratic crooks". IMO the Republicans have not done very well in power either in our state. They should have focused on financial issues but wasted a lot of time on social issues (such as passing the H1B bathroom bill). At least they have not stolen everything that is not nailed down... yet (like the state Democrats did).
Short form - No investigation, just a complaint from a right wing partisan group which you take as gospel because you are desperate after the fraud Republicans perpetuated and need 'muh both sides' material. Also you pretending that Republicans have some moral authority after the shit they pulled because they can point to someone who they complained against. Asinine logic as usual. Got it.