In your case they do. "Had went" is one heckuva mistake, dude. And here you should have written "do." You're a joke. Tell us again about the highly educated libtards
You (and your leftist brethern) all said that Bush was a dim bulb, one of the most, if not the most, intellectually lacking President ever to be elected to the office. Now you are saying he's smart? But then again, you are 1/2 Republican: (check the voting results for which party more broadly supported the bailouts for clarity)
Honest and forthright. About Iraq's peripheral participation in 9/11? Iraq's quest for yellowcake and its stores of WMD? Or when his administration sought to reclassify fast food jobs as being in the manufacturing sector since, after all, those foods units required on-premise assembly?
Would this be one of those ends-justifying-the-means agruments? And, if so, how is that related in any way to honesty and forthrightness?
As honest and forthright as the democraps, Gayfly? Why are you so obsessed with us? <object width="480" height="385"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/Cwqh4wQPoQk?fs=1&hl=en_US"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/Cwqh4wQPoQk?fs=1&hl=en_US" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="480" height="385"></embed></object>
You "forget" that Bush insisted his intel guys go back and not return until they "found" something. GIGO.