It's my understanding that the process begins by building the fastest fractal first which starts at the price cases. Would you expand on what you are perceiving that is making this current iteration of transference more challenging than it needs to be?
I agree with building up from 2 bar tapes, and using the cases, and recommend it. I'm recommending against using, for learning, other setup than 5 min ES, trading on prv, trading fractals that aren't clearly backed by volume, ftt, dominance.
Ok, having separate color for stictches now. Not sure how people make bar annotations, but my experience with NT is that it doesn't play nice across different timeframes, scaling/zoom-levels and the vectors tend to get jumbled up after loading new bars etc. So something automatic would be nice. Maybe there's something standard people uses? The high number is really just because there's lots of bars in the dataseries. So what I can do is just start counting from where I start analysis, and not show anything prior to that. Could be an interesting feature to try out anyways. These are with original bar numbers (starting analysis at bar #1): The first channel is just fanned out from bar #2-3 (pt1 and pt2 bar #2, pt3 bar #3) and includes all trendsegments until short trend at bar #13, which is also fanned out.
What does your theory say about the direction of future prices if one bar is taller than the combined height of the 10 bears before it?
Started using bookmarks, price cases that make money and fastest fractal: Annotating at the bar of detection, and mostly not redrawing too much, so this is very near to how it would look in realtime, except some differences during bar evolution. Annotation text providing some context.
I apologize in advance. I've had some success in trading, but I always find the devil is in where your theory transfers into execution. What actual vehicle are you using to translate all this into a trade ?