Oil Fund loses 7 years of gains

Discussion in 'Commodity Futures' started by Pekelo, Dec 22, 2015.

  1. Not everybody wants to be hedge fund manager. Very successful traders that cannot trade huge positions trade for themselves only. Because they cannot profit from the size of a hedge fund as their system does not allow this, and second they take not 2 and 20% but 100%. If you watch how many funds can stay out of the red returns over a period of 10 years or more, it looks like these managers are not the toptraders but the subtop. Or they are real crooks like Madoff.
     
    #11     Dec 22, 2015
  2. I agree, it doesn't take a genius to realize this -- I never have understood why individuals would hand over their money to a hedge fund manager. they take 2% regardless and 20% of profits....and the majority or average of them...have rather shitty returns. o_O

    Trading/managing your money isn't that difficult. People treat hedge fund managers like they're geniuses. a knight in shining armor riding on a white horse...who will bring them heavenly returns... :confused:

    A hedge fund is basically a mutual fund, but playing or getting creative with the addition of options. instead of just going long on stock/buying and holding.
     
    #12     Dec 22, 2015
  3. Jamie J.

    Jamie J.

    Well said, but in fact, it is true. I agree with you. For a reason, some successful people advised not to trust money to someone else. You know better than anyone.
     
    #13     Dec 22, 2015
  4. newwurldmn

    newwurldmn

    Start a fund and offer those economics.
     
    #14     Dec 22, 2015
  5. Redneck

    Redneck

    Amazing the benefit a simple ole stop loss would have provided

    or conversely...

    The devastation it would have prevented



    Appears some of theses big bad ole HFs..., aren't any better than a neophyte

    My former "professional mm" wasn't any better


    Go figure

    RN
     
    #15     Dec 22, 2015
    bone likes this.
  6. bone

    bone

    That would be fine if investors were willing to agree to a gate structure in terms of withdrawals. On a managed account basis, where clients can withdraw funds at any time, you would need that 1% just to cover the overhead. There are some fairly stiff legal and accounting expenses that are ongoing and will not be as variable as the client count in a managed account business model.
     
    #16     Dec 22, 2015
  7. This is the lesson. Never invest in crude or crude stocks, eventually you will lose your shirt.
     
    #17     Dec 23, 2015
  8. d08

    d08

    Good points. 1% is probably doable and it's naturally only for overhead, not for parties and bonuses.
    The gate structure seems like an obvious thing to do. HFs need to become more like long-term investments rather than a place to park your money in for months or a few years. This would eliminate many of these quick buck chasers that seem to account for 70% of HF managers.
     
    #18     Dec 23, 2015
  9. The whole pizza industry needs an overhaul. There should be a very very small per-pie fee (less than $1) and a performance fee if I really like the pie.
     
    #19     Dec 23, 2015
  10. bone

    bone

    What kills me is how delta-directional Andy Hall's returns were with crude. Lazy, stupid fucker if you ask me. John Arnold was a much smarter manager in terms of leveraged hydrocarbons IMHO.
     
    #20     Dec 23, 2015
    options-george likes this.