This evening I have been thinking I might buy myself a treat with all my paid posting money. Maybe just blow it all on a box of Lindt Linor milk chocolate truffle balls.
Yowsa. Hmph. Never knew that. Interesting. No person shall be a Senator or Representative in Congress, or elector of President and Vice-President, or hold any office, civil or military, under the United States, or under any State, who, having previously taken an oath, as a member of Congress, or as an officer of the United States, or as a member of any State legislature, or as an executive or judicial officer of any State, to support the Constitution of the United States, shall have engaged in insurrection or rebellion against the same, or given aid or comfort to the enemies thereof. But Congress may by a vote of two-thirds of each House, remove such disability.
Lots of gray area there. So who determines if a person was guilty of engaging in an insurrection? And who determines (legally) when an occurrence can be defined as such, and hence applied? Sorry Freddie, MSNBC wasn't around back then so don't even go there.
That is the 64 dollar question. Calling J6 an insurrection doesn't make it so. Trump has not been found guilty of inciting or participating on an insurrection, other than in the media. He hasn't even been charged with that, which means if he wins they'd have to charge and convict him before January. If it's close, they may use it as a hail Mary. Of he wins in a blowout that would be a tough sell.
Incitement of insurrection was the 2nd impeachment and he was impeached in a bipartisan vote. There is no double jeopardy protection because the conviction is a political and not criminal process. The Senate could simply take a mulligan and sentence him. I can say that locals around where I own some land near a national park were spooked enough by unusual white power militia activity to track them back to their homes and went to the police. It is all fun and games until it ain't.